Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FISRX vs RLBAX
FISRX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FISRX vs RLBAX
Franklin Income R
Price$2.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.75B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.28
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.06B
FISRX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FISRX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FISRX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. FISRX (75.8B). FISRX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FISRX (5.13) vs RLBAX (1.15). FISRX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FISRX (24 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FISRX (0.97). FISRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.72 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FISRX: RLBAX (250) vs FISRX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. FISRX (7.22). FISRX return over 5 years is better than : 47.29 vs. RLBAX (37.86).
| FISRX | RLBAX | FISRX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.31 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.31 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.588 | 12.839 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.8B | 263B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.13 | 1.15 | 445% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.22 | 9.12 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.82 | 40.57 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.29 | 37.86 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.97 | 71.58 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement