Ad is loading...
FISRX vs RLBAX
FISRX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FISRX vs RLBAX
Franklin Income R
Price$2.26
Change+$0.02 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.77B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$33.37
Change+$0.43 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.9B
FISRX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FISRX vs. RLBAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FISRX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 227B vs. FISRX (70.8B). FISRX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FISRX (5.30) vs RLBAX (1.27). FISRX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FISRX (23 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FISRX (0.97). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FISRX (49.72). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FISRX: RLBAX (250) vs FISRX (1000). FISRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.00 vs. RLBAX (3.37). FISRX return over 5 years is better than : 43.64 vs. RLBAX (31.54).
| FISRX | RLBAX | FISRX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.33 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.33 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.865 | -1.759 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.8B | 227B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.30 | 1.27 | 417% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.00 | 3.37 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.31 | 12.43 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.64 | 31.54 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.91 | 41.03 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...