Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FISRX vs RLBAX
FISRX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FISRX vs RLBAX
Franklin Income R
Price$2.36
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.44B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.79
Change+$0.13 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.99B
FISRX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FISRX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FISRX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 253B vs. FISRX (74.4B). FISRX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FISRX (5.26) vs RLBAX (1.17). FISRX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FISRX (24 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FISRX (0.97). FISRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.72 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FISRX: RLBAX (250) vs FISRX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.31 vs. FISRX (7.72). FISRX return over 5 years is better than : 45.38 vs. RLBAX (32.80).
| FISRX | RLBAX | FISRX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.31 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.31 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.321 | 8.447 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.4B | 253B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.26 | 1.17 | 450% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.72 | 9.31 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.76 | 29.22 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.38 | 32.80 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.93 | 57.96 | 109% |