FITB
Price
$45.92
Change
+$0.92 (+2.04%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
29.78B
30 days until earnings call
MCBI
Price
$20.22
Change
-$0.04 (-0.20%)
Updated
Sep 16 closing price
Capitalization
128.71M
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FITB vs MCBI

Header iconFITB vs MCBI Comparison
Open Charts FITB vs MCBIBanner chart's image
Fifth Third Ban
Price$45.92
Change+$0.92 (+2.04%)
Volume$145.82K
Capitalization29.78B
Mountain Commerce Ban
Price$20.22
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
Volume$3.5K
Capitalization128.71M
FITB vs MCBI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FITB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FITB vs. MCBI commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FITB is a Hold and MCBI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FITB: $45.91 vs. MCBI: $20.39)
Brand notoriety: FITB and MCBI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FITB: 107% vs. MCBI: 224%
Market capitalization -- FITB: $29.78B vs. MCBI: $128.71M
FITB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $29.78B. MCBI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $128.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FITB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FITB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCBI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FITB is a better buy in the long-term than MCBI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FITB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FITB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCBI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FITB is a better buy in the short-term than MCBI.

Price Growth

FITB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.88% price change this week, while MCBI (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

FITB is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

MCBI is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FITB($29.8B) has a higher market cap than MCBI($129M). MCBI has higher P/E ratio than FITB: MCBI (19.80) vs FITB (14.30). FITB YTD gains are higher at: 10.617 vs. MCBI (-4.368). MCBI has less debt than FITB: MCBI (70M) vs FITB (17.6B). FITB has higher revenues than MCBI: FITB (8.45B) vs MCBI (32M).
FITBMCBIFITB / MCBI
Capitalization29.8B129M23,101%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.617-4.368-243%
P/E Ratio14.3019.8072%
Revenue8.45B32M26,406%
Total CashN/A23.5M-
Total Debt17.6B70M25,143%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FITB vs MCBI: Fundamental Ratings
FITB
MCBI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7690
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3768
SMR RATING
1..100
678
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4162
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCBI's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as FITB (84) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBI’s stock grew similarly to FITB’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBI (68) in the null industry. This means that FITB’s stock grew similarly to MCBI’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's SMR Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCBI (78) in the null industry. This means that FITB’s stock grew significantly faster than MCBI’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's Price Growth Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCBI (57) in the null industry. This means that FITB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCBI’s over the last 12 months.

FITB's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBI (62) in the null industry. This means that FITB’s stock grew similarly to MCBI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FITBMCBI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FITB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EVAV30.170.88
+3.00%
Direxion Dl Elctrc&Atnms vhcls Bull2XETF
TAFM25.430.03
+0.12%
AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF
LIBD254.35N/A
N/A
LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF
CVMC63.34-0.01
-0.02%
Calvert US Mid-Cp Cor Rspnb ETF
GOF14.88-0.02
-0.13%
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund

FITB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FITB has been closely correlated with PNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FITB jumps, then PNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FITB
1D Price
Change %
FITB100%
+2.02%
PNC - FITB
91%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
HBAN - FITB
91%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
RF - FITB
91%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
CFG - FITB
90%
Closely correlated
+2.23%
USB - FITB
89%
Closely correlated
+2.52%
More

MCBI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCBI and BOTJ have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCBI and BOTJ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBI
1D Price
Change %
MCBI100%
+0.84%
BOTJ - MCBI
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
OPBK - MCBI
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
CKHGY - MCBI
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
FITB - MCBI
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
ORRF - MCBI
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
More