Ad is loading...
FITE vs SMH
FITE vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts FITE vs SMH
SPDR® S&P Kensho Future Security ETF
Price$62.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.86K
CapitalizationN/A
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$251.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.56M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FITE vs SMH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
FITE vs. SMH commentary
Oct 30, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FITE is a StrongSell and SMH is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 25B vs. FITE (68.3M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than FITE: SMH (43.655) vs FITE (13.821). FITE was incepted earlier than SMH: FITE (7 years) vs SMH (13 years). FITE has a higher turnover SMH (18.00) vs SMH (18.00).
| FITE | SMH | FITE / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 13.821 | 43.655 | 32% |
| Net Assets | 68.3M | 25B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 18.00 | 183% |
| Yield | 0.16 | 0.46 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FITE | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FITE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FITE has been loosely correlated with PL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FITE jumps, then PL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FITE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FITE | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| PL - FITE | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.61% | ||
| MIR - FITE | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| NET - FITE | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| DRS - FITE | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| DDOG - FITE | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -0.69% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 90% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | -4.31% | ||
More | ||||