Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIWBX vs RLBCX
FIWBX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FIWBX vs RLBCX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Z
Price$15.63
Change+$0.11 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.01B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.39
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.06B
FIWBX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIWBX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIWBX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. FIWBX (3.01B). FIWBX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FIWBX (3.84) vs RLBCX (1.53). FIWBX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FIWBX (7 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FIWBX (0.74). FIWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 230.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). FIWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: FIWBX (0) vs RLBCX (250). FIWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.20 vs. RLBCX (9.50). FIWBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.86 vs. RLBCX (40.28).
| FIWBX | RLBCX | FIWBX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.89 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.89 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.924 | 13.071 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.01B | 263B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.84 | 1.53 | 250% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.20 | 9.50 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.78 | 42.14 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.86 | 40.28 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement