Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIWGX vs ITBAX
FIWGX vs ITBAX Comparison
Open Charts FIWGX vs ITBAX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core
Price$9.35
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.96B
Hartford Total Return Bond A
Price$9.35
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.53B
FIWGX vs ITBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIWGX vs. ITBAX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIWGX is a Hold and ITBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIWGX has more cash in the bank: 84B vs. ITBAX (4.53B). FIWGX pays higher dividends than ITBAX: FIWGX (4.28) vs ITBAX (3.95). FIWGX was incepted earlier than ITBAX: FIWGX (7 years) vs ITBAX (29 years). ITBAX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FIWGX (0.41). FIWGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. ITBAX (47.00). FIWGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ITBAX: FIWGX (0) vs ITBAX (2000). FIWGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.10 vs. ITBAX (2.20). FIWGX return over 5 years is better than : -1.74 vs. ITBAX (-2.97).
| FIWGX | ITBAX | FIWGX / ITBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.68 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.68 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.747 | 6.352 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84B | 4.53B | 1,855% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.28 | 3.95 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.10 | 2.20 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.13 | 15.25 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.74 | -2.97 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers