Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIWGX vs RFAAX
FIWGX vs RFAAX Comparison
Open Charts FIWGX vs RFAAX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core
Price$9.25
Change+$0.03 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.96B
Russell Inv Investment Grade Bond A
Price$18.44
Change+$0.06 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
FIWGX vs RFAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIWGX vs. RFAAX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIWGX is a Hold and RFAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIWGX has more cash in the bank: 84B vs. RFAAX (1.03B). RFAAX (4.40) and FIWGX (4.28) have matching dividends . FIWGX was incepted earlier than RFAAX: FIWGX (7 years) vs RFAAX (15 years). RFAAX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FIWGX (0.41). FIWGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RFAAX (77.00). FIWGX (0) and RFAAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIWGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.31 vs. RFAAX (2.24). FIWGX return over 5 years is better than : -2.10 vs. RFAAX (-9.33).
| FIWGX | RFAAX | FIWGX / RFAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.80 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.81 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.176 | 5.435 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84B | 1.03B | 8,140% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.28 | 4.40 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.31 | 2.24 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.64 | 8.97 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.10 | -9.33 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 5.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement