Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIWGX vs RFATX
FIWGX vs RFATX Comparison
Open Charts FIWGX vs RFATX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core
Price$9.29
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.7B
Russell Inv Investment Grade Bond S
Price$18.53
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
FIWGX vs RFATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIWGX vs. RFATX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIWGX is a Hold and RFATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIWGX has more cash in the bank: 86.7B vs. RFATX (1.04B). RFATX pays higher dividends than FIWGX: RFATX (4.82) vs FIWGX (4.26). FIWGX was incepted earlier than RFATX: FIWGX (7 years) vs RFATX (18 years). RFATX (0.56) is less costly to investors than FIWGX (0.41). FIWGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 207.00 vs. RFATX (77.00). FIWGX (0) and RFATX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIWGX (6.86) and RFATX (6.61) have marching annual gain over last year. FIWGX return over 5 years is better than : -2.29 vs. RFATX (-7.52).
| FIWGX | RFATX | FIWGX / RFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.51 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.56 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.921 | 6.960 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 86.7B | 1.04B | 8,369% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.26 | 4.82 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | 6.61 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.23 | 14.47 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.29 | -7.52 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 9.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement