Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FIWGX vs RFATX
FIWGX vs RFATX Comparison
Open Charts FIWGX vs RFATX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core
Price$9.25
Change+$0.03 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.96B
Russell Inv Investment Grade Bond S
Price$18.43
Change+$0.06 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
FIWGX vs RFATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FIWGX vs. RFATX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIWGX is a Hold and RFATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIWGX has more cash in the bank: 84B vs. RFATX (1.04B). RFATX pays higher dividends than FIWGX: RFATX (4.69) vs FIWGX (4.28). FIWGX was incepted earlier than RFATX: FIWGX (7 years) vs RFATX (18 years). RFATX (0.56) is less costly to investors than FIWGX (0.41). FIWGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RFATX (77.00). FIWGX (0) and RFATX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIWGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.31 vs. RFATX (3.03). FIWGX return over 5 years is better than : -2.10 vs. RFATX (-7.51).
| FIWGX | RFATX | FIWGX / RFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.51 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.56 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.176 | 6.204 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 84B | 1.04B | 8,100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.28 | 4.69 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.31 | 3.03 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.64 | 10.51 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.10 | -7.51 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement