Advertisement
FIZZ vs PEP
Which Stock Would AI Choose? National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ) vs. PepsiCo (PEP) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- PEP boasts a market cap over 68 times larger than FIZZ, reflecting its diversified global footprint in beverages and snacks versus FIZZ's niche focus on sparkling waters and juices.
- Recent earnings for PEP showed a beat with volume rebound from price adjustments, while FIZZ met EPS expectations but saw softer revenue.
- FIZZ trades at a lower P/E ratio (16.93) compared to PEP (25.84), suggesting relative value but higher profit margins at 15.71% versus 8.77%.
- Year-to-date, PEP has outperformed FIZZ with 11.34% gains against 6.21%, amid broader market positioning.
- Both stocks exhibit low volatility with betas below 1, but PEP's 0.41 beta indicates greater stability.
Introduction
This stock comparison pits National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ), a specialized player in sparkling waters and functional beverages, against PepsiCo (PEP), a beverage and snack giant with global reach. Investors seeking exposure to the non-alcoholic beverages sector may weigh FIZZ's niche growth potential and valuation appeal against PEP's scale, diversification, and dividend reliability. Traders focused on relative performance and recent market momentum will find insights into price behavior, sentiment, and positioning in today's environment of shifting consumer preferences and pricing dynamics.
FIZZ Overview and Recent Performance
National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ) develops and markets sparkling waters like LaCroix, energy drinks under Rip It, and juices through brands such as Shasta and Faygo, primarily in the U.S. and Canada. In recent market activity, FIZZ shares have traded around the mid-$30s, within a 52-week range of $31.21 to $47.89, reflecting steady but range-bound movement. The stock's year-to-date gain of 6.21% trails broader indices amid quieter sentiment, influenced by in-line quarterly earnings in early March that showed EPS of $0.44 but revenue slightly below expectations at $264.59 million. High profit margins (15.71%) and low debt support resilience, though limited catalysts have kept momentum subdued in recent weeks.
PEP Overview and Recent Performance
PepsiCo (PEP) is a leading multinational in beverages (Pepsi, Gatorade) and convenient foods (Frito-Lay, Quaker), operating across North America, Europe, Latin America, and Asia Pacific. Shares have hovered near $158 in recent trading, within a 52-week band of $127.60 to $171.48, buoyed by positive developments. Year-to-date performance stands at 11.34%, driven by a strong Q1 earnings report showing EPS of $1.61 (beating estimates) and organic sales growth of 2.6%, with snack volumes rebounding from strategic price cuts. Reaffirmed full-year guidance and product innovations like Gatorade rebranding have bolstered investor sentiment in recent weeks, underscoring operational adaptability.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of over 350, selected by AI algorithms for suitability in current market conditions like heightened volatility across sectors. These bots employ diverse strategies—swing trading, trend following, dip buying, and multi-ticker agents—with timeframes from 5 minutes to 55 days. Performance stats shine: annualized returns range from +15.50% to +167.82%, win rates 53.91% to 87.72%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Examples include a semiconductors bot at +97.21% annualized (68.54% win rate) and gold miners agents exceeding +50% returns. Traders can explore these for automated insights across thousands of tickers; visit the Trending AI Robots page to evaluate fits for your portfolio.
Head-to-Head Comparison
FIZZ operates a focused business model on healthier beverages like sparkling waters, contrasting PEP's broad portfolio spanning snacks and global franchises, which drives steadier revenue streams. Growth drivers differ: FIZZ relies on LaCroix brand loyalty and high ROE (37.95%), while PEP leverages scale (ROE 42.85%) and innovations amid pricing pressures. Recent momentum favors PEP with earnings-driven gains, versus FIZZ's stability. Risk factors include FIZZ's smaller size and volume sensitivity (beta 0.73), balanced by low debt, against PEP's lower beta (0.41) but exposure to commodity costs. Sector-wise, both tap beverages, but PEP adds defensive foods; sentiment tilts toward PEP's catalysts.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI models would likely favor PEP in the current environment, given its trend consistency from recent earnings beats, superior scale for stability, and positive volume catalysts outweighing FIZZ's value appeal. Probabilistic edge to PEP for relative positioning amid market rotations.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIZZ is a Hold and PEP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIZZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePEP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FIZZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIZZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FIZZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PEP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FIZZ (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -1.45% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +1.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +4.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.78%.
Reported Earning Dates
FIZZ is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2026.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Jul 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+4.69% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| FIZZ | PEP | FIZZ / PEP | |
| Capitalization | 3.12B | 197B | 2% |
| EBITDA | 260M | 16.3B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | 2.634 | 0.442 | 597% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.93 | 22.09 | 77% |
| Revenue | 1.2B | 95.4B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 314M | 10.8B | 3% |
| Total Debt | 62.7M | 52.7B | 0% |
FIZZ | PEP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | 22 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEP's Valuation (21) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIZZ (75). This means that PEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FIZZ (100). This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's SMR Rating (22) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FIZZ (25). This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FIZZ (62). This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIZZ (73). This means that PEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
| FIZZ | PEP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 40% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 40% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 60% | 17 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 34% |
Advertisement
FIZZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIZZ has been loosely correlated with KDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIZZ jumps, then KDP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIZZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIZZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| KDP - FIZZ | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PEP - FIZZ | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CCEP - FIZZ | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| COKE - FIZZ | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CELH - FIZZ | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
PEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with KDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then KDP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP | 100% | N/A | ||
| KDP - PEP | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| FIZZ - PEP | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CCEP - PEP | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| COKE - PEP | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MNST - PEP | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||