Advertisement
FIZZ vs PEP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIZZ is a Hold and PEP is a Hold.
FIZZ in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026
FIZZ moved above its 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 31 of 46 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where FIZZ's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 16 of 35 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 46%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on FIZZ as a result. In 55 of 84 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FIZZ just turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where FIZZ's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 26 of 43 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
The 50-day moving average for FIZZ moved above the 200-day moving average on September 08, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
Following a +8.09% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FIZZ advanced for three days, in 168 of 280 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The 10-day moving average for FIZZ crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 17, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 7 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 44%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FIZZ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
FIZZ broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 26 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. FIZZ’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 77 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (7.530) is normal, around the industry mean (6.793). P/E Ratio (15.911) is within average values for comparable stocks, (43.051). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (4.032) is also within normal values, averaging (3.732). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.014) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.554) is also within normal values, averaging (2.785).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FIZZ’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 75, placing this stock worse than average.
PEP in upward trend: price may ascend as a result of having broken its lower Bollinger Band on September 16, 2026
PEP may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 23 of 42 cases where PEP's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 55%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where PEP's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 9 of 27 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 33%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 27 of 63 cases where PEP's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 43%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PEP just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where PEP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 21 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 46%.
Following a +1.06% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PEP advanced for three days, in 115 of 296 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 39%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 09, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PEP as a result. In 47 of 91 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 52%.
PEP moved below its 50-day moving average on September 09, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for PEP crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 10, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 7 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 41%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PEP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 48%.
The Aroon Indicator for PEP entered a downward trend on October 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 16 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (7.937) is normal, around the industry mean (6.793). P/E Ratio (16.841) is within average values for comparable stocks, (43.051). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.316) is also within normal values, averaging (3.732). PEP has a moderately high Dividend Yield (0.045) as compared to the industry average of (0.014). P/S Ratio (1.901) is also within normal values, averaging (2.785).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 20 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 61 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. PEP’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 81 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. PEP’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 75, placing this stock worse than average.
FIZZ | PEP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEP's Valuation (16) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIZZ (77). This means that PEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FIZZ (100). This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's SMR Rating (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FIZZ (26). This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
FIZZ's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (61). This means that FIZZ’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.
FIZZ's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as PEP (81). This means that FIZZ’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.
| FIZZ | PEP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 33% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 39% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 62% | 14 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 43% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIZZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PEP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FIZZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIZZ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FIZZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PEP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FIZZ (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +9.89% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +1.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
FIZZ is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2026.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+0.13% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AMDG | 129.87 | 4.61 | +3.68% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) | |||
| EWQ | 41.63 | 0.39 | +0.95% |
| iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) | |||
| NICO | 26.20 | N/A | N/A |
| Hexis Active Nicotine Engagement ETF | |||
| FJUN | 61.98 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) | |||
| XSEP | 45.60 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September (XSEP) | |||
FIZZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIZZ has been loosely correlated with KDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIZZ jumps, then KDP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIZZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIZZ | 100% | +2.61% | ||
| KDP - FIZZ | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| PEP - FIZZ | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| CCEP - FIZZ | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| COKE - FIZZ | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.55% | ||
| CELH - FIZZ | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.62% | ||
More | ||||
PEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| CCEP - PEP | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| KDP - PEP | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| FIZZ - PEP | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.61% | ||
| MNST - PEP | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.03% | ||
| COKE - PEP | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.55% | ||
More | ||||