Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FJAMX vs FSNQX
FJAMX vs FSNQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FJAMX vs. FSNQX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJAMX is a Hold and FSNQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNQX has more cash in the bank: 31.1B vs. FJAMX (3.65B). FSNQX pays higher dividends than FJAMX: FSNQX (2.14) vs FJAMX (1.82). FJAMX was incepted earlier than FSNQX: FJAMX (7 years) vs FSNQX (8 years). FJAMX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FSNQX (0.56). FJAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FSNQX (16.00). FJAMX (0) and FSNQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FJAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.89 vs. FSNQX (8.17). FJAMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.18 vs. FSNQX (23.57).
| FJAMX | FSNQX | FJAMX / FSNQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.56 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.56 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.375 | 6.217 | 119% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 31.1B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 2.14 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.89 | 8.17 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.23 | 31.38 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.18 | 23.57 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement