Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FJLMX vs FSNQX
FJLMX vs FSNQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FJLMX vs. FSNQX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJLMX is a Hold and FSNQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNQX has more cash in the bank: 31.1B vs. FJLMX (3.65B). FSNQX (2.14) and FJLMX (2.12) have matching dividends . FJLMX was incepted earlier than FSNQX: FJLMX (7 years) vs FSNQX (8 years). FSNQX (0.56) is less costly to investors than FJLMX (0.36). FJLMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FSNQX (16.00). FJLMX (0) and FSNQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FJLMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.24 vs. FSNQX (8.17). FJLMX return over 5 years is better than : 34.58 vs. FSNQX (23.57).
| FJLMX | FSNQX | FJLMX / FSNQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.56 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.56 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.581 | 6.217 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 31.1B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.12 | 2.14 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.24 | 8.17 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.56 | 31.38 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.58 | 23.57 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement