Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FJLMX vs RBETX
FJLMX vs RBETX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FJLMX vs. RBETX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJLMX is a Hold and RBETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBETX has more cash in the bank: 50.6B vs. FJLMX (3.65B). FJLMX pays higher dividends than RBETX: FJLMX (2.12) vs RBETX (1.29). FJLMX was incepted earlier than RBETX: FJLMX (7 years) vs RBETX (18 years). RBETX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FJLMX (0.36). FJLMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. RBETX (7.00). FJLMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBETX: FJLMX (0) vs RBETX (250). FJLMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.24 vs. RBETX (9.73). FJLMX return over 5 years is better than : 34.58 vs. RBETX (28.60).
| FJLMX | RBETX | FJLMX / RBETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.42 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.42 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.581 | 7.578 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 50.6B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.12 | 1.29 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.24 | 9.73 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.56 | 26.87 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.58 | 28.60 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement