Ad is loading...
FJLMX vs RBETX
FJLMX vs RBETX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FJLMX vs. RBETX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJLMX is a Hold and RBETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBETX has more cash in the bank: 48.6B vs. FJLMX (3.51B). FJLMX pays higher dividends than RBETX: FJLMX (2.14) vs RBETX (1.33). FJLMX was incepted earlier than RBETX: FJLMX (7 years) vs RBETX (18 years). RBETX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FJLMX (0.36). FJLMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RBETX (7.00). FJLMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBETX: FJLMX (0) vs RBETX (250). FJLMX (8.34) and RBETX (8.16) have marching annual gain over last year. FJLMX return over 5 years is better than : 34.95 vs. RBETX (28.97).
| FJLMX | RBETX | FJLMX / RBETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.42 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.42 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.690 | 2.088 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51B | 48.6B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.14 | 1.33 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.34 | 8.16 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.81 | 14.08 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.95 | 28.97 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 37.38 | - |