Ad is loading...
FJTKX vs RBHHX
FJTKX vs RBHHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FJTKX vs. RBHHX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJTKX is a Hold and RBHHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBHHX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. FJTKX (20.1B). FJTKX pays higher dividends than RBHHX: FJTKX (1.66) vs RBHHX (0.75). FJTKX was incepted earlier than RBHHX: FJTKX (8 years) vs RBHHX (11 years). RBHHX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FJTKX (0.46). FJTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RBHHX (5.00). FJTKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBHHX: FJTKX (0) vs RBHHX (250). FJTKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.61 vs. RBHHX (6.22). RBHHX (43.69) and FJTKX (43.54) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FJTKX | RBHHX | FJTKX / RBHHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 1.17 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 1.17 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.075 | -1.407 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.1B | 37.6B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 0.75 | 222% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.61 | 6.22 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.82 | 15.60 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.54 | 43.69 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers