Advertisement
FJTNY vs TVAHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJTNY is a Buy and TVAHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FJTNY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTVAHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FJTNY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- TVAHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FJTNY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TVAHF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FJTNY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
- TVAHF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FJTNY (@Broadcasting) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TVAHF (@Broadcasting) price change was -5.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Broadcasting industry was -5.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.38%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Broadcasting (-5.11% weekly)Broadcasting industry includes companies that operate facilities broadcasting radio and/or television programs. Sirius XM Holdings, Inc. (which provides satellite radio and online radio services); Fox Corporation (news and sports broadcasting on TV); and CBS Corporation (TV broadcasting) are some of the behemoths of this industry. The burgeoning digital space has been a disruption for the industry, propelling them to up the ante on their own digital presence.
| FJTNY | TVAHF | FJTNY / TVAHF | |
| Capitalization | 4.65B | 2.11B | 220% |
| EBITDA | 77.5B | 23.9B | 324% |
| Gain YTD | 90.678 | 64.606 | 140% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.40 | 13.45 | 107% |
| Revenue | 567B | 315B | 180% |
| Total Cash | 198B | 61.8B | 320% |
| Total Debt | 351B | N/A | - |
FJTNY | TVAHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 99 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 58 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TVAHF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as FJTNY (30). This means that TVAHF’s stock grew similarly to FJTNY’s over the last 12 months.
FJTNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TVAHF (58). This means that FJTNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TVAHF’s over the last 12 months.
TVAHF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as FJTNY (99). This means that TVAHF’s stock grew similarly to FJTNY’s over the last 12 months.
TVAHF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FJTNY (46). This means that TVAHF’s stock grew similarly to FJTNY’s over the last 12 months.
FJTNY's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as TVAHF (31). This means that FJTNY’s stock grew similarly to TVAHF’s over the last 12 months.
| FJTNY | TVAHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 27% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 37% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 25% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 21% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 29% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 38% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | N/A |
Advertisement
FJTNY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FJTNY and TVAHF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FJTNY and TVAHF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FJTNY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FJTNY | 100% | N/A | ||
| TVAHF - FJTNY | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ITVPY - FJTNY | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FUBO - FJTNY | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.29% | ||
| PBSFY - FJTNY | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.68% | ||
| THDDY - FJTNY | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TVAHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TVAHF and FJTNY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TVAHF and FJTNY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TVAHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVAHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| FJTNY - TVAHF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SGBAF - TVAHF | 9% Poorly correlated | +9.58% | ||
| ITVPY - TVAHF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PBSFF - TVAHF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| THDDY - TVAHF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||