FJTSF
Price
$24.06
Change
+$1.06 (+4.61%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
43.85B
NIPNF
Price
$31.77
Change
+$0.44 (+1.40%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
42.84B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FJTSF vs NIPNF

Header iconFJTSF vs NIPNF Comparison
Open Charts FJTSF vs NIPNFBanner chart's image
Fujitsu
Price$24.06
Change+$1.06 (+4.61%)
Volume$1.15K
Capitalization43.85B
NEC
Price$31.77
Change+$0.44 (+1.40%)
Volume$200
Capitalization42.84B
FJTSF vs NIPNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FJTSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FJTSF vs. NIPNF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJTSF is a Hold and NIPNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FJTSF: $24.06 vs. NIPNF: $31.77)
Brand notoriety: FJTSF and NIPNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FJTSF: 69% vs. NIPNF: 17%
Market capitalization -- FJTSF: $43.85B vs. NIPNF: $42.84B
FJTSF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $43.85B. NIPNF’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $42.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $262.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FJTSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNIPNF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FJTSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NIPNF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NIPNF is a better buy in the long-term than FJTSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FJTSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIPNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FJTSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NIPNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NIPNF is a better buy in the short-term than FJTSF.

Price Growth

FJTSF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -1.80% price change this week, while NIPNF (@Information Technology Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.42%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+2.15% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FJTSF($43.9B) and NIPNF($42.8B) have the same market capitalization . NIPNF has higher P/E ratio than FJTSF: NIPNF (35.67) vs FJTSF (31.26). NIPNF YTD gains are higher at: 83.699 vs. FJTSF (50.375). NIPNF (377B) and FJTSF (367B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . FJTSF has higher revenues than NIPNF: FJTSF (3.74T) vs NIPNF (3.42T).
FJTSFNIPNFFJTSF / NIPNF
Capitalization43.9B42.8B103%
EBITDA367B377B97%
Gain YTD50.37583.69960%
P/E Ratio31.2635.6788%
Revenue3.74T3.42T110%
Total Cash357BN/A-
Total Debt286BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FJTSF vs NIPNF: Fundamental Ratings
FJTSF
NIPNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8029
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3810
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5641
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1412
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6530

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FJTSF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPNF (23). This means that FJTSF’s stock grew similarly to NIPNF’s over the last 12 months.

NIPNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as FJTSF (38). This means that NIPNF’s stock grew similarly to FJTSF’s over the last 12 months.

NIPNF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FJTSF (100). This means that NIPNF’s stock grew similarly to FJTSF’s over the last 12 months.

NIPNF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FJTSF (56). This means that NIPNF’s stock grew similarly to FJTSF’s over the last 12 months.

NIPNF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as FJTSF (14). This means that NIPNF’s stock grew similarly to FJTSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FJTSFNIPNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FJTSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIRTP19.200.17
+0.88%
Air T
KRNY6.58-0.03
-0.45%
Kearny Financial Corp
AORT40.43-0.48
-1.17%
Artivion
ACET0.84-0.02
-1.86%
Adicet Bio
PEGA58.29-1.89
-3.14%
Pegasystems Inc

FJTSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FJTSF has been loosely correlated with CAPMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FJTSF jumps, then CAPMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FJTSF
1D Price
Change %
FJTSF100%
+4.62%
CAPMF - FJTSF
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
FJTSY - FJTSF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
CFTLF - FJTSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNRLF - FJTSF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NIPNF - FJTSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NIPNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIPNF and CFTLF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIPNF and CFTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIPNF
1D Price
Change %
NIPNF100%
N/A
CFTLF - NIPNF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FJTSY - NIPNF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
NTDTY - NIPNF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
FJTSF - NIPNF
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.62%
NOSUF - NIPNF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More