FJTSF
Price
$23.86
Change
+$1.88 (+8.55%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
41.75B
NIPNF
Price
$27.75
Change
-$1.25 (-4.31%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
37.17B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FJTSF vs NIPNF

Header iconFJTSF vs NIPNF Comparison
Open Charts FJTSF vs NIPNFBanner chart's image
Fujitsu
Price$23.86
Change+$1.88 (+8.55%)
Volume$3.31K
Capitalization41.75B
NEC
Price$27.75
Change-$1.25 (-4.31%)
Volume$939
Capitalization37.17B
FJTSF vs NIPNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FJTSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FJTSF vs. NIPNF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJTSF is a StrongBuy and NIPNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FJTSF: $23.86 vs. NIPNF: $27.75)
Brand notoriety: FJTSF and NIPNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FJTSF: 57% vs. NIPNF: 216%
Market capitalization -- FJTSF: $41.75B vs. NIPNF: $37.17B
FJTSF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $41.75B. NIPNF’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $37.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $271.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FJTSF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNIPNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FJTSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NIPNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FJTSF is a better buy in the long-term than NIPNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FJTSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIPNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FJTSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NIPNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NIPNF is a better buy in the short-term than FJTSF.

Price Growth

FJTSF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +0.52% price change this week, while NIPNF (@Information Technology Services) price change was +4.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+2.81% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FJTSF($41.7B) has a higher market cap than NIPNF($37.2B). NIPNF (30.27) and FJTSF (30.12) have similar P/E ratio . NIPNF YTD gains are higher at: 60.460 vs. FJTSF (49.125). NIPNF (377B) and FJTSF (367B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . FJTSF has higher revenues than NIPNF: FJTSF (3.74T) vs NIPNF (3.42T).
FJTSFNIPNFFJTSF / NIPNF
Capitalization41.7B37.2B112%
EBITDA367B377B97%
Gain YTD49.12560.46081%
P/E Ratio30.1230.2799%
Revenue3.74T3.42T110%
Total Cash357BN/A-
Total Debt286BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FJTSF vs NIPNF: Fundamental Ratings
FJTSF
NIPNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5096
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4140
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1626
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FJTSF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPNF (17). This means that FJTSF’s stock grew similarly to NIPNF’s over the last 12 months.

FJTSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NIPNF (100). This means that FJTSF’s stock grew significantly faster than NIPNF’s over the last 12 months.

FJTSF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPNF (100). This means that FJTSF’s stock grew similarly to NIPNF’s over the last 12 months.

NIPNF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FJTSF (41). This means that NIPNF’s stock grew similarly to FJTSF’s over the last 12 months.

FJTSF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPNF (26). This means that FJTSF’s stock grew similarly to NIPNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FJTSFNIPNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FJTSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMND1.100.20
+21.82%
Clearmind Medicine
DIBS2.850.10
+3.64%
1stdibs.com
IDCC224.522.92
+1.32%
InterDigital
OFIX11.120.06
+0.54%
Orthofix Medical
CAG20.99-0.15
-0.71%
Conagra Brands

FJTSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FJTSF has been loosely correlated with CAPMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FJTSF jumps, then CAPMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FJTSF
1D Price
Change %
FJTSF100%
+8.55%
CAPMF - FJTSF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
FJTSY - FJTSF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
CFTLF - FJTSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNRLF - FJTSF
10%
Poorly correlated
+9.00%
FDRVF - FJTSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NIPNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIPNF and CFTLF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIPNF and CFTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIPNF
1D Price
Change %
NIPNF100%
N/A
CFTLF - NIPNF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FJTSY - NIPNF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
NTDTY - NIPNF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
FJTSF - NIPNF
7%
Poorly correlated
+8.55%
NOSUF - NIPNF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More