FJTSY vs HUBV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FJTSY is a StrongBuy and HUBV is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FJTSY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FJTSY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HUBV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FJTSY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FJTSY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FJTSY (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -2.59% price change this week, while HUBV (@Information Technology Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.65%.
Reported Earning Dates
FJTSY is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Information Technology Services (-3.15% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
| FJTSY | HUBV | FJTSY / HUBV | |
| Capitalization | 33B | 6.89M | 479,164% |
| EBITDA | 371B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.693 | -89.524 | -23% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.92 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.76T | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
FJTSY | HUBV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 96 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 27 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FJTSY's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBV (56). This means that FJTSY’s stock grew similarly to HUBV’s over the last 12 months.
FJTSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUBV (100). This means that FJTSY’s stock grew significantly faster than HUBV’s over the last 12 months.
FJTSY's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBV (100). This means that FJTSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBV’s over the last 12 months.
FJTSY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBV (96). This means that FJTSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBV’s over the last 12 months.
FJTSY's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBV (100). This means that FJTSY’s stock grew similarly to HUBV’s over the last 12 months.
| FJTSY | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% |
FJTSY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FJTSY and FJTSF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FJTSY and FJTSF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FJTSY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FJTSY | 100% | -1.53% | ||
| FJTSF - FJTSY | 32% Poorly correlated | +7.65% | ||
| GIB - FJTSY | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| NRILY - FJTSY | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| AMADF - FJTSY | 23% Poorly correlated | +4.07% | ||
| NURAF - FJTSY | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
More | ||||
HUBV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HUBV and NGRRF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HUBV and NGRRF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBV | 100% | N/A | ||
| NGRRF - HUBV | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VNET - HUBV | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
| FJTSY - HUBV | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.53% | ||
| KNRLF - HUBV | 3% Poorly correlated | +3.06% | ||
| HLTEF - HUBV | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||