Ad is loading...
FKASX vs WCMNX
FKASX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FKASX vs WCMNX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap A
Price$45.38
Change+$0.46 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.12B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$11.64
Change+$0.13 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.14M
FKASX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKASX vs. WCMNX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKASX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKASX has more cash in the bank: 3.12B vs. WCMNX (42.1M). FKASX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: FKASX (1.11) vs WCMNX (0.00). FKASX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FKASX (22 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.11) is less costly to investors than FKASX (1.50). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FKASX (34.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKASX: WCMNX (1000) vs FKASX (1500). FKASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.68 vs. WCMNX (-7.10). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 19.77 vs. FKASX (4.36).
| FKASX | WCMNX | FKASX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.24 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 2.11 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.279 | -9.299 | 57% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.12B | 42.1M | 7,401% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.68 | -7.10 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.23 | 14.99 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.36 | 19.77 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...