Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKASX vs WCMNX
FKASX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FKASX vs WCMNX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap A
Price$51.81
Change+$0.10 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.32B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.69
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.31M
FKASX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKASX vs. WCMNX commentary
Oct 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKASX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKASX has more cash in the bank: 3.32B vs. WCMNX (44.3M). FKASX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: FKASX (0.97) vs WCMNX (0.00). FKASX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FKASX (23 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FKASX (1.50). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FKASX (34.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKASX: WCMNX (1000) vs FKASX (1500). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.19 vs. FKASX (4.86). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 20.46 vs. FKASX (3.41).
| FKASX | WCMNX | FKASX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.24 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 2.04 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.625 | 8.117 | 119% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.32B | 44.3M | 7,488% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.86 | 6.19 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.77 | 30.42 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.41 | 20.46 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.17 | N/A | - |