Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKCCX vs FTAZX
FKCCX vs FTAZX Comparison
Open Charts FKCCX vs FTAZX
Nuveen KY Municipal Bond C
Price$9.83
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.31M
Franklin AZ Tax Free Income A1
Price$9.71
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets647.88M
FKCCX vs FTAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKCCX vs. FTAZX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKCCX is a Hold and FTAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTAZX has more cash in the bank: 648M vs. FKCCX (207M). FTAZX pays higher dividends than FKCCX: FTAZX (3.35) vs FKCCX (2.14). FKCCX was incepted earlier than FTAZX: FKCCX (12 years) vs FTAZX (38 years). FKCCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FTAZX (0.67). FKCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FTAZX (10.60). FTAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKCCX: FTAZX (1000) vs FKCCX (2500). FTAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.05 vs. FKCCX (-0.01). FTAZX return over 5 years is better than : -1.02 vs. FKCCX (-2.47).
| FKCCX | FTAZX | FKCCX / FTAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.67 | 288% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.67 | 288% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.155 | 1.545 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 207M | 648M | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.14 | 3.35 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.01 | 1.05 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.83 | 11.11 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.47 | -1.02 | 243% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.33 | 2.52 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement