Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKCCX vs MDXBX
FKCCX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts FKCCX vs MDXBX
Nuveen KY Municipal Bond C
Price$9.83
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.31M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$10.03
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.34B
FKCCX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKCCX vs. MDXBX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKCCX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.34B vs. FKCCX (207M). MDXBX pays higher dividends than FKCCX: MDXBX (3.50) vs FKCCX (2.14). FKCCX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: FKCCX (12 years) vs MDXBX (39 years). FKCCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). FKCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. MDXBX (17.30). FKCCX (2500) and MDXBX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.47 vs. FKCCX (-0.01). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 5.55 vs. FKCCX (-2.47).
| FKCCX | MDXBX | FKCCX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.49 | 394% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.53 | 364% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.155 | 2.061 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 207M | 2.34B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.14 | 3.50 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.01 | 1.47 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.83 | 12.98 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.47 | 5.55 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.33 | 16.99 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers