Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKCCX vs MDXBX
FKCCX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts FKCCX vs MDXBX
Nuveen KY Municipal Bond C
Price$9.49
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.54M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
FKCCX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKCCX vs. MDXBX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKCCX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. FKCCX (210M). MDXBX pays higher dividends than FKCCX: MDXBX (3.51) vs FKCCX (2.11). FKCCX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: FKCCX (12 years) vs MDXBX (38 years). FKCCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). FKCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. MDXBX (17.30). FKCCX (2500) and MDXBX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.91 vs. FKCCX (-2.95). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 2.16 vs. FKCCX (-6.19).
| FKCCX | MDXBX | FKCCX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.49 | 394% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.53 | 364% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.845 | -1.398 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 210M | 2.28B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 3.51 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.95 | -0.91 | 325% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.52 | 7.23 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.19 | 2.16 | -286% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.85 | 12.81 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement