Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKCCX vs TFBVX
FKCCX vs TFBVX Comparison
Open Charts FKCCX vs TFBVX
Nuveen KY Municipal Bond C
Price$9.49
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.54M
T. Rowe Price Virginia Tax Free Bond I
Price$10.79
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
FKCCX vs TFBVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKCCX vs. TFBVX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKCCX is a Hold and TFBVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBVX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. FKCCX (210M). TFBVX pays higher dividends than FKCCX: TFBVX (3.53) vs FKCCX (2.11). FKCCX was incepted earlier than TFBVX: FKCCX (12 years) vs TFBVX (8 years). FKCCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than TFBVX (0.42). FKCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. TFBVX (19.10). FKCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBVX: FKCCX (2500) vs TFBVX (500000). TFBVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.46 vs. FKCCX (-2.95). TFBVX return over 5 years is better than : 0.13 vs. FKCCX (-6.19).
| FKCCX | TFBVX | FKCCX / TFBVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.42 | 460% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.42 | 460% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.845 | -1.968 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 210M | 1.29B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 3.53 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.95 | -1.46 | 202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.52 | 6.82 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.19 | 0.13 | -4,787% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers