Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKIDX vs RERBX
FKIDX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts FKIDX vs RERBX
Fidelity Diversified Intl K6
Price$16.69
Change+$0.12 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.75B
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$57.70
Change+$0.70 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.4B
FKIDX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKIDX vs. RERBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKIDX is a Buy and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. FKIDX (4.75B). FKIDX pays higher dividends than RERBX: FKIDX (1.91) vs RERBX (0.25). FKIDX was incepted earlier than RERBX: FKIDX (8 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FKIDX (0.60). FKIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RERBX (35.00). FKIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: FKIDX (0) vs RERBX (250). FKIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.77 vs. RERBX (11.71). FKIDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.19 vs. RERBX (7.66).
| FKIDX | RERBX | FKIDX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.56 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.56 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.020 | 13.471 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.75B | 132B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 0.25 | 749% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.77 | 11.71 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.52 | 21.60 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.19 | 7.66 | 590% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement