Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKIDX vs RERBX
FKIDX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts FKIDX vs RERBX
Fidelity Diversified Intl K6
Price$16.54
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.74B
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$56.19
Change+$0.16 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.84B
FKIDX vs RERBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKIDX vs. RERBX commentary
Jun 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKIDX is a StrongBuy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. FKIDX (4.74B). FKIDX pays higher dividends than RERBX: FKIDX (1.92) vs RERBX (0.45). FKIDX was incepted earlier than RERBX: FKIDX (8 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FKIDX (0.60). FKIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RERBX (30.00). FKIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: FKIDX (0) vs RERBX (250). FKIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.28 vs. RERBX (3.39). FKIDX return over 5 years is better than : 59.13 vs. RERBX (15.71).
| FKIDX | RERBX | FKIDX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.56 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.56 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.949 | 10.501 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.74B | 134B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 0.45 | 431% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.28 | 3.39 | 421% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.50 | 18.02 | 264% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.13 | 15.71 | 376% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement