Ad is loading...
FKINX vs RLBAX
FKINX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FKINX vs RLBAX
Franklin Income A1
Price$2.38
Change+$0.01 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.14B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$34.04
Change+$0.08 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.54B
FKINX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKINX vs. RLBAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKINX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. FKINX (73.1B). FKINX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FKINX (5.55) vs RLBAX (1.27). FKINX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FKINX (77 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FKINX (0.62). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FKINX (49.72). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKINX: RLBAX (250) vs FKINX (1000). FKINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.98 vs. RLBAX (3.49). FKINX return over 5 years is better than : 61.07 vs. RLBAX (45.32).
| FKINX | RLBAX | FKINX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.33 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.33 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 77 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.298 | 0.213 | 1,077% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.1B | 234B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.55 | 1.27 | 436% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.98 | 3.49 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.37 | 10.40 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.07 | 45.32 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.58 | 46.20 | 118% |