Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKINX vs RLBAX
FKINX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FKINX vs RLBAX
Franklin Income A1
Price$2.45
Change+$0.02 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.17
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.44B
FKINX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKINX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKINX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. FKINX (75.3B). FKINX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FKINX (5.48) vs RLBAX (1.17). FKINX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FKINX (77 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FKINX (0.62). FKINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.72 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKINX: RLBAX (250) vs FKINX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.71 vs. FKINX (7.89). FKINX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. RLBAX (34.17).
| FKINX | RLBAX | FKINX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.31 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.31 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 77 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.848 | 9.567 | 72% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.3B | 256B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.48 | 1.17 | 469% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.89 | 8.71 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.48 | 27.69 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.15 | 34.17 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.28 | 59.78 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement