Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKINX vs RLBAX
FKINX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FKINX vs RLBAX
Franklin Income A1
Price$2.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.68B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.59
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.73B
FKINX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKINX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKINX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 258B vs. FKINX (75.7B). FKINX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FKINX (5.34) vs RLBAX (1.15). FKINX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FKINX (77 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FKINX (0.62). FKINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.72 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKINX: RLBAX (250) vs FKINX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. FKINX (7.85). FKINX return over 5 years is better than : 49.13 vs. RLBAX (35.40).
| FKINX | RLBAX | FKINX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.31 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.31 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 77 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.651 | 10.805 | 80% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.7B | 258B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.34 | 1.15 | 464% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.85 | 9.12 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.58 | 37.15 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.13 | 35.40 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.72 | 67.71 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement