FKRAF
Price
$16.68
Change
-$0.20 (-1.18%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
GPGNF
Price
$1.57
Change
+$0.12 (+8.28%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
1.61B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FKRAF vs GPGNF

Header iconFKRAF vs GPGNF Comparison
Open Charts FKRAF vs GPGNFBanner chart's image
Fiskars OY AKT
Price$16.68
Change-$0.20 (-1.18%)
Volume$110
Capitalization1.3B
Grupo Gigante S.A.B. de C.V
Price$1.57
Change+$0.12 (+8.28%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization1.61B
FKRAF vs GPGNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FKRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FKRAF vs. GPGNF commentary
Sep 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKRAF is a Hold and GPGNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FKRAF: $15.79 vs. GPGNF: $1.57)
Brand notoriety: FKRAF and GPGNF are both not notable
FKRAF represents the Home Improvement Chains, while GPGNF is part of the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FKRAF: 295% vs. GPGNF: 385%
Market capitalization -- FKRAF: $1.3B vs. GPGNF: $1.61B
FKRAF [@Home Improvement Chains] is valued at $1.3B. GPGNF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Improvement Chains] industry ranges from $420.76B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $49.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Improvement Chains] industry is $46.34B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FKRAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGPGNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FKRAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GPGNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPGNF is a better buy in the long-term than FKRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FKRAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GPGNF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FKRAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GPGNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FKRAF is a better buy in the short-term than GPGNF.

Price Growth

FKRAF (@Home Improvement Chains) experienced а -6.46% price change this week, while GPGNF (@Specialty Stores) price change was +8.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Improvement Chains industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.24%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Improvement Chains (+0.20% weekly)

The home improvement chains industry sells home improvement merchandise and do-it-yourself repair and building goods. Customers include individual contractors or construction managers on one hand; on the other hand, there are retail consumers who’d either buy raw materials/items from the store to do a project on their own, or pay extra for installation services. Products sold include fencing supplies, lumber materials, hardware, lighting fixtures, plumbing supplies, home decor items, bathroom remodel items, roofing materials, tools and wallboard to name a few. The Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. are some of the biggest home improvement retailing companies in the U.S. Allowing all types of customers the flexibility to choose or buy products both offline and online and then having the products shipped to the respective sites/homes are some of the potential drivers of a home improvement chain’s popularity. Many big-box home improvement chains are looking to expand their overseas presence. Supply-chain efficiency and distribution management are some of the key ingredients to grow/make profit in this industry.

@Specialty Stores (+1.93% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPGNF($1.61B) has a higher market cap than FKRAF($1.3B). FKRAF has higher P/E ratio than GPGNF: FKRAF (70.83) vs GPGNF (14.40). FKRAF YTD gains are higher at: 1.903 vs. GPGNF (0.000). GPGNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.94B vs. FKRAF (124M). GPGNF has more cash in the bank: 4.53B vs. FKRAF (72.1M). FKRAF has less debt than GPGNF: FKRAF (628M) vs GPGNF (16.3B). GPGNF has higher revenues than FKRAF: GPGNF (35.2B) vs FKRAF (1.14B).
FKRAFGPGNFFKRAF / GPGNF
Capitalization1.3B1.61B81%
EBITDA124M6.94B2%
Gain YTD1.9030.000-
P/E Ratio70.8314.40492%
Revenue1.14B35.2B3%
Total Cash72.1M4.53B2%
Total Debt628M16.3B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FKRAF vs GPGNF: Fundamental Ratings
FKRAF
GPGNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9339
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8641
SMR RATING
1..100
9078
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1262
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FKRAF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as GPGNF (31). This means that FKRAF’s stock grew similarly to GPGNF’s over the last 12 months.

GPGNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FKRAF (86). This means that GPGNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FKRAF’s over the last 12 months.

GPGNF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as FKRAF (90). This means that GPGNF’s stock grew similarly to FKRAF’s over the last 12 months.

GPGNF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as FKRAF (55). This means that GPGNF’s stock grew similarly to FKRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FKRAF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPGNF (62). This means that FKRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPGNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FKRAFGPGNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FKRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACERX10.88N/A
N/A
Invesco Equity and Income C
LGILX28.86N/A
N/A
Schwab Select Large Cap Growth
NWHYX14.44N/A
N/A
Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Gr Instl Svc
NWXPX10.55N/A
N/A
Nationwide International Index Instl Svc
PEDMX13.62N/A
N/A
Principal Edge MidCap R6

FKRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKRAF and CMEIF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKRAF and CMEIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKRAF
1D Price
Change %
FKRAF100%
-5.36%
CMEIF - FKRAF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DFRYF - FKRAF
10%
Poorly correlated
+10.17%
GPGNF - FKRAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DUFRY - FKRAF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
IHCPF - FKRAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GPGNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GPGNF and IHCPF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GPGNF and IHCPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPGNF
1D Price
Change %
GPGNF100%
N/A
IHCPF - GPGNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FKRAF - GPGNF
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.36%
HLFDY - GPGNF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.10%
CZASF - GPGNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DFRYF - GPGNF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+10.17%
More