Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKTFX vs MCOIX
FKTFX vs MCOIX Comparison
Open Charts FKTFX vs MCOIX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.77B
NYLI MacKay California Muni
Price$9.46
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
FKTFX vs MCOIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTFX vs. MCOIX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTFX is a Hold and MCOIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 12.8B vs. MCOIX (1.29B). MCOIX (3.83) and FKTFX (3.79) have matching dividends . FKTFX was incepted earlier than MCOIX: FKTFX (49 years) vs MCOIX (13 years). FKTFX (0.60) is less costly to investors than MCOIX (0.51). MCOIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FKTFX (7.96). FKTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCOIX: FKTFX (1000) vs MCOIX (1000000). MCOIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.20 vs. FKTFX (-0.85). MCOIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.60 vs. FKTFX (-2.35).
| FKTFX | MCOIX | FKTFX / MCOIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.50 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.51 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 49 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.016 | -0.129 | -12% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.8B | 1.29B | 991% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.79 | 3.83 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.85 | -0.20 | 423% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.08 | 11.85 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.35 | 2.60 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.70 | 28.35 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement