Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKTFX vs MSCCX
FKTFX vs MSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FKTFX vs MSCCX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.77B
NYLI MacKay California Muni
Price$9.46
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
FKTFX vs MSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTFX vs. MSCCX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTFX is a Hold and MSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 12.8B vs. MSCCX (1.3B). FKTFX pays higher dividends than MSCCX: FKTFX (3.79) vs MSCCX (3.28). FKTFX was incepted earlier than MSCCX: FKTFX (49 years) vs MSCCX (13 years). MSCCX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FKTFX (0.60). MSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FKTFX (7.96). FKTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSCCX: FKTFX (1000) vs MSCCX (2500). MSCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.73 vs. FKTFX (-0.85). MSCCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.04 vs. FKTFX (-2.35).
| FKTFX | MSCCX | FKTFX / MSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.03 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.04 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 49 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.016 | -0.485 | -3% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.8B | 1.3B | 987% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.79 | 3.28 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.85 | -0.73 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.08 | 10.08 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.35 | 0.04 | -6,166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.70 | 21.46 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement