Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKTFX vs MSODX
FKTFX vs MSODX Comparison
Open Charts FKTFX vs MSODX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.61
Change+$0.05 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.7B
NYLI MacKay California Muni Class R6
Price$9.41
Change+$0.05 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
FKTFX vs MSODX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTFX vs. MSODX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTFX is a Hold and MSODX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. MSODX (1.29B). MSODX (3.84) and FKTFX (3.79) have matching dividends . FKTFX was incepted earlier than MSODX: FKTFX (49 years) vs MSODX (6 years). FKTFX (0.60) is less costly to investors than MSODX (0.48). MSODX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FKTFX (7.96). MSODX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTFX: MSODX (0) vs FKTFX (1000). MSODX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.61 vs. FKTFX (-1.16). MSODX return over 5 years is better than : 2.03 vs. FKTFX (-2.94).
| FKTFX | MSODX | FKTFX / MSODX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.48 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.48 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 49 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.586 | -0.750 | 78% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.7B | 1.29B | 987% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.79 | 3.84 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.16 | -0.61 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.27 | 10.84 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.94 | 2.03 | -145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement