Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKTFX vs TCCAX
FKTFX vs TCCAX Comparison
Open Charts FKTFX vs TCCAX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.73
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.9B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond C
Price$9.80
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets524.18M
FKTFX vs TCCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTFX vs. TCCAX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTFX is a Hold and TCCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. TCCAX (524M). FKTFX pays higher dividends than TCCAX: FKTFX (3.79) vs TCCAX (2.98). FKTFX was incepted earlier than TCCAX: FKTFX (49 years) vs TCCAX (26 years). TCCAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FKTFX (0.60). TCCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FKTFX (7.96). FKTFX (1000) and TCCAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FKTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.10 vs. TCCAX (-1.80). TCCAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.63 vs. FKTFX (-1.47).
| FKTFX | TCCAX | FKTFX / TCCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.49 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.76 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 49 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.918 | -0.511 | -180% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 524M | 2,462% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.79 | 2.98 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.10 | -1.80 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.89 | 10.01 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.47 | 1.63 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.22 | 15.84 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement