Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKTFX vs TCCAX
FKTFX vs TCCAX Comparison
Open Charts FKTFX vs TCCAX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.54
Change+$0.02 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.56B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond C
Price$9.42
Change+$0.04 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets516.03M
FKTFX vs TCCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTFX vs. TCCAX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTFX is a Hold and TCCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. TCCAX (516M). FKTFX pays higher dividends than TCCAX: FKTFX (3.80) vs TCCAX (2.97). FKTFX was incepted earlier than TCCAX: FKTFX (49 years) vs TCCAX (26 years). TCCAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FKTFX (0.60). TCCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FKTFX (7.96). FKTFX (1000) and TCCAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FKTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.95 vs. TCCAX (-4.44). TCCAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.74 vs. FKTFX (-5.04).
| FKTFX | TCCAX | FKTFX / TCCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.49 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.76 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 49 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.974 | -4.430 | 45% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 516M | 2,442% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.80 | 2.97 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.95 | -4.44 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.13 | 2.27 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.04 | -2.74 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.90 | 11.25 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers