Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKTFX vs TCCAX
FKTFX vs TCCAX Comparison
Open Charts FKTFX vs TCCAX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income A1
Price$6.79
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.01B
JHancock CA Municipal Bond C
Price$9.91
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets540.26M
FKTFX vs TCCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKTFX vs. TCCAX commentary
Nov 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKTFX is a Hold and TCCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTFX has more cash in the bank: 13B vs. TCCAX (540M). FKTFX pays higher dividends than TCCAX: FKTFX (3.72) vs TCCAX (2.92). FKTFX was incepted earlier than TCCAX: FKTFX (49 years) vs TCCAX (27 years). TCCAX (1.72) is less costly to investors than FKTFX (0.60). TCCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FKTFX (7.96). FKTFX (1000) and TCCAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FKTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.90 vs. TCCAX (0.28). TCCAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.12 vs. FKTFX (-0.71).
| FKTFX | TCCAX | FKTFX / TCCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.47 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.72 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 49 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.625 | 1.232 | 213% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13B | 540M | 2,407% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.72 | 2.92 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.90 | 0.28 | 685% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.43 | 11.12 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.71 | 2.12 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.01 | 16.35 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement