Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FKUTX vs PCUFX
FKUTX vs PCUFX Comparison
Open Charts FKUTX vs PCUFX
FKUTX vs PCUFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKUTX vs. PCUFX commentary
Oct 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKUTX is a Hold and PCUFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKUTX has more cash in the bank: 7.55B vs. PCUFX (3.58B). FKUTX pays higher dividends than PCUFX: FKUTX (2.13) vs PCUFX (1.29). FKUTX was incepted earlier than PCUFX: FKUTX (77 years) vs PCUFX (31 years). PCUFX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FKUTX (0.71). PCUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FKUTX (6.80). FKUTX (1000) and PCUFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FKUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.95 vs. PCUFX (5.78). FKUTX return over 5 years is better than : 35.75 vs. PCUFX (12.24).
| FKUTX | PCUFX | FKUTX / PCUFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.61 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.61 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 77 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.745 | 17.974 | 115% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.55B | 3.58B | 211% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 1.29 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.95 | 5.78 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.32 | 21.29 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.75 | 12.24 | 292% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.25 | 37.16 | 221% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers