Ad is loading...
FKUTX vs PCUFX
FKUTX vs PCUFX Comparison
Open Charts FKUTX vs PCUFX
FKUTX vs PCUFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FKUTX vs. PCUFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKUTX is a Buy and PCUFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKUTX has more cash in the bank: 6.6B vs. PCUFX (3.17B). FKUTX pays higher dividends than PCUFX: FKUTX (2.34) vs PCUFX (1.16). FKUTX was incepted earlier than PCUFX: FKUTX (77 years) vs PCUFX (31 years). PCUFX (1.63) is less costly to investors than FKUTX (0.71). PCUFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FKUTX (6.80). FKUTX (1000) and PCUFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FKUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.32 vs. PCUFX (11.16). FKUTX return over 5 years is better than : 29.26 vs. PCUFX (11.21).
| FKUTX | PCUFX | FKUTX / PCUFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.63 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.63 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 77 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.049 | 0.841 | 482% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.6B | 3.17B | 208% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.34 | 1.16 | 203% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.32 | 11.16 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.57 | -5.24 | -145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.26 | 11.21 | 261% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.73 | 3.26 | 1,585% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...