FKWL
Price
$4.54
Change
-$0.32 (-6.58%)
Updated
Nov 19, 12:35 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
57.04M
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KPIFF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
7.63M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FKWL vs KPIFF

Header iconFKWL vs KPIFF Comparison
Open Charts FKWL vs KPIFFBanner chart's image
Franklin Wireless
Price$4.54
Change-$0.32 (-6.58%)
Volume$500
Capitalization57.04M
Edgewater Wireless Systems
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization7.63M
FKWL vs KPIFF Comparison Chart in %
FKWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KPIFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FKWL vs. KPIFF commentary
Nov 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKWL is a Hold and KPIFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FKWL: $4.84 vs. KPIFF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: FKWL and KPIFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FKWL: 85% vs. KPIFF: 12%
Market capitalization -- FKWL: $57.04M vs. KPIFF: $7.63M
FKWL [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $57.04M. KPIFF’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $7.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $304.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $9.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FKWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKPIFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FKWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KPIFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FKWL is a better buy in the long-term than KPIFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FKWL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KPIFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FKWL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KPIFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KPIFF is a better buy in the short-term than FKWL.

Price Growth

FKWL (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -5.47% price change this week, while KPIFF (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -2.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -4.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

FKWL is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (-4.80% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKWL($57M) has a higher market cap than KPIFF($7.63M). FKWL YTD gains are higher at: -0.456 vs. KPIFF (-24.645). FKWL (-2M) and KPIFF (-2.1M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . FKWL has more cash in the bank: 5.24M vs. KPIFF (623K). KPIFF has less debt than FKWL: KPIFF (565K) vs FKWL (1.39M). FKWL has higher revenues than KPIFF: FKWL (46.1M) vs KPIFF (0).
FKWLKPIFFFKWL / KPIFF
Capitalization57M7.63M747%
EBITDA-2M-2.1M95%
Gain YTD-0.456-24.6452%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue46.1M0-
Total Cash5.24M623K842%
Total Debt1.39M565K247%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FKWL vs KPIFF: Fundamental Ratings
FKWL
KPIFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5429
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10095
SMR RATING
1..100
87100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4562
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KPIFF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as FKWL (54). This means that KPIFF’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

KPIFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as FKWL (100). This means that KPIFF’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as KPIFF (100). This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to KPIFF’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as KPIFF (62). This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to KPIFF’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KPIFF (100). This means that FKWL’s stock grew significantly faster than KPIFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FKWLKPIFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FKWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KPIFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRM2.110.14
+7.11%
MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies
DAL57.131.37
+2.46%
Delta Air Lines
PJT161.863.00
+1.89%
PJT Partners
LVWR4.15-0.21
-4.82%
LiveWire Group
VOR9.15-0.87
-8.68%
Vor Biopharma Inc

FKWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKWL and ITRN have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKWL and ITRN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKWL
1D Price
Change %
FKWL100%
-2.81%
ITRN - FKWL
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
ZBRA - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
VSAT - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.70%
BOXL - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.13%
LTRX - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.17%
More

KPIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KPIFF and MFCO have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KPIFF and MFCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KPIFF
1D Price
Change %
KPIFF100%
+0.32%
MFCO - KPIFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVTZF - KPIFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETCMY - KPIFF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.30%
ERIXF - KPIFF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
FKWL - KPIFF
-7%
Poorly correlated
-2.81%
More