FKWL
Price
$4.89
Change
+$0.02 (+0.41%)
Updated
Apr 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
35.23M
48 days until earnings call
MFCO
Price
$0.35
Change
+$0.03 (+9.38%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
2.06M
Ad is loading...

FKWL vs MFCO

Header iconFKWL vs MFCO Comparison
Open Charts FKWL vs MFCOBanner chart's image
Franklin Wireless
Price$4.89
Change+$0.02 (+0.41%)
Volume$500
Capitalization35.23M
Microwave Filter
Price$0.35
Change+$0.03 (+9.38%)
Volume$12.5K
Capitalization2.06M
FKWL vs MFCO Comparison Chart
Loading...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FKWL vs. MFCO commentary
Apr 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FKWL is a Hold and MFCO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2025
Stock price -- (FKWL: $4.94 vs. MFCO: $0.35)
Brand notoriety: FKWL and MFCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Telecommunications Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FKWL: 83% vs. MFCO: 142%
Market capitalization -- FKWL: $35.23M vs. MFCO: $2.06M
FKWL [@Telecommunications Equipment] is valued at $35.23M. MFCO’s [@Telecommunications Equipment] market capitalization is $2.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry ranges from $202.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Telecommunications Equipment] industry is $5.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FKWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FKWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FKWL and MFCO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FKWL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FKWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

FKWL (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -14.97% price change this week, while MFCO (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -6.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -4.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

FKWL is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2025.

MFCO is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Telecommunications Equipment (-4.81% weekly)

The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKWL($35.2M) has a higher market cap than MFCO($2.06M). FKWL has higher P/E ratio than MFCO: FKWL (24.15) vs MFCO (13.37). MFCO YTD gains are higher at: 6.061 vs. FKWL (0.816). MFCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 196K vs. FKWL (-1.17M). FKWL has more cash in the bank: 32.7M vs. MFCO (538K). FKWL has less debt than MFCO: FKWL (0) vs MFCO (232K). FKWL has higher revenues than MFCO: FKWL (47.4M) vs MFCO (3.76M).
FKWLMFCOFKWL / MFCO
Capitalization35.2M2.06M1,706%
EBITDA-1.17M196K-596%
Gain YTD0.8166.06113%
P/E Ratio24.1513.37181%
Revenue47.4M3.76M1,259%
Total Cash32.7M538K6,078%
Total Debt0232K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FKWL vs MFCO: Fundamental Ratings
FKWL
MFCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5890
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91100
SMR RATING
1..100
9161
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4776
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
316
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFCO's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as FKWL (57). This means that MFCO’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as MFCO (100). This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to MFCO’s over the last 12 months.

MFCO's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as FKWL (91). This means that MFCO’s stock grew similarly to FKWL’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MFCO (76). This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to MFCO’s over the last 12 months.

FKWL's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as MFCO (16). This means that FKWL’s stock grew similarly to MFCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FKWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FKWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VLAIX40.281.74
+4.51%
Value Line Asset Allocation Instl
PAPTX10.52N/A
N/A
PACE Alternative Strategies P2
CCVAX28.52N/A
N/A
Calvert Small-Cap A
GLNMX20.42N/A
N/A
MFS Global New Discovery R4
TCIHX21.31N/A
N/A
Nuveen International Eq Idx I

FKWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FKWL and ITRN have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FKWL and ITRN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FKWL
1D Price
Change %
FKWL100%
-1.20%
ITRN - FKWL
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.50%
ZBRA - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
+14.11%
VSAT - FKWL
22%
Poorly correlated
+14.42%
BOXL - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.32%
LTRX - FKWL
21%
Poorly correlated
+10.97%
More

MFCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFCO and FKWL have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFCO and FKWL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFCO
1D Price
Change %
MFCO100%
+9.38%
FKWL - MFCO
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
KPIFF - MFCO
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYSNF - MFCO
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
EUTLF - MFCO
2%
Poorly correlated
+5.32%
ERIXF - MFCO
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More