Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLAX vs MINV
FLAX vs MINV Comparison
Open Charts FLAX vs MINV
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Price$29.09
Change-$0.27 (-0.92%)
Volume$151
Net Assets34.97M
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
Price$34.46
Change-$0.66 (-1.88%)
Volume$1.12K
Net Assets74.76M
FLAX vs MINV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLAX vs. MINV commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLAX is a Hold and MINV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MINV has more net assets: 74.8M vs. FLAX (35M). FLAX has a higher annual dividend yield than MINV: FLAX (28.596) vs MINV (25.384). FLAX was incepted earlier than MINV: FLAX (8 years) vs MINV (3 years). FLAX (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than MINV (0.79). MINV has a higher turnover FLAX (4.50) vs FLAX (4.50).
| FLAX | MINV | FLAX / MINV | |
| Gain YTD | 28.596 | 25.384 | 113% |
| Net Assets | 35M | 74.8M | 47% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.79 | 24% |
| Turnover | 4.50 | 268.33 | 2% |
| Yield | 1.71 | 0.18 | 945% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLAX | MINV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FLAX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLAX and ACGP have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLAX and ACGP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLAX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLAX | 100% | -1.13% | ||
| ACGP - FLAX | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.03% | ||
| WB - FLAX | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.41% | ||
| TUYA - FLAX | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.47% | ||
| DQ - FLAX | 16% Poorly correlated | -8.57% | ||
| TME - FLAX | 14% Poorly correlated | -5.61% | ||
More | ||||
MINV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MINV has been loosely correlated with DIDIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MINV jumps, then DIDIY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MINV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MINV | 100% | -2.18% | ||
| DIDIY - MINV | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.65% | ||
| AMAT - MINV | 10% Poorly correlated | -6.15% | ||
| PDD - MINV | 10% Poorly correlated | -4.31% | ||
| ALGM - MINV | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.85% | ||
| MELI - MINV | 5% Poorly correlated | -8.54% | ||
More | ||||