Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCGX vs RBGEX
FLCGX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts FLCGX vs RBGEX
Meeder Sector Rotation Retail
Price$38.57
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.58M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$28.38
Change+$0.11 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.89B
FLCGX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCGX vs. RBGEX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCGX is a Buy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. FLCGX (39.6M). FLCGX pays higher dividends than RBGEX: FLCGX (0.77) vs RBGEX (0.00). FLCGX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: FLCGX (40 years) vs RBGEX (11 years). FLCGX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RBGEX (1.17). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLCGX: RBGEX (250) vs FLCGX (2500). RBGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.74 vs. FLCGX (-1.12). RBGEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.95 vs. FLCGX (35.37).
| FLCGX | RBGEX | FLCGX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.17 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.17 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.535 | 14.435 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6M | 23.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.12 | 15.74 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.92 | 47.98 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.37 | 38.95 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.80 | 91.56 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement