Ad is loading...
FLCH vs KWEB
FLCH vs KWEB Comparison
Open Charts FLCH vs KWEB
Franklin FTSE China ETF
Price$19.52
Change-$1.57 (-7.44%)
Volume$120
Net Assets175.13M
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$31.23
Change-$3.32 (-9.61%)
Volume$51.43K
Net Assets8.15B
FLCH vs KWEB Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCH vs. KWEB commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCH is a Hold and KWEB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 8.15B vs. FLCH (175M). KWEB has a higher annual dividend yield than FLCH: KWEB (18.194) vs FLCH (14.620). FLCH was incepted earlier than KWEB: FLCH (7 years) vs KWEB (12 years). FLCH (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than KWEB (0.70). KWEB has a higher turnover FLCH (9.59) vs FLCH (9.59).
| FLCH | KWEB | FLCH / KWEB | |
| Gain YTD | 14.620 | 18.194 | 80% |
| Net Assets | 175M | 8.15B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.70 | 27% |
| Turnover | 9.59 | 32.00 | 30% |
| Yield | 2.49 | 2.94 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLCH | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | 9 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLCH has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLCH jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLCH | 100% | -0.91% | ||
| JD - FLCH | 80% Closely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| BILI - FLCH | 78% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| BIDU - FLCH | 75% Closely correlated | -2.32% | ||
| BEKE - FLCH | 72% Closely correlated | +2.69% | ||
| YMM - FLCH | 67% Closely correlated | -3.69% | ||
More | ||||
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | -1.14% | ||
| BABA - KWEB | 89% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| WB - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | -2.86% | ||
| JD - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| BILI - KWEB | 82% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| BIDU - KWEB | 80% Closely correlated | -2.32% | ||
More | ||||