Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCNX vs RGEBX
FLCNX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FLCNX vs RGEBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.11
Change-$0.15 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
FLCNX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCNX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCNX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. FLCNX (37.7B). FLCNX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FLCNX (0.24) vs RGEBX (0.00). FLCNX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FLCNX (8 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FLCNX (0.45). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FLCNX (19.00). FLCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FLCNX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FLCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.07 vs. RGEBX (20.79). FLCNX return over 5 years is better than : 113.22 vs. RGEBX (38.92).
| FLCNX | RGEBX | FLCNX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.09 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.09 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.825 | 12.136 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.7B | 325B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.07 | 20.79 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 98.94 | 43.03 | 230% |
| Returns for 5 years | 113.22 | 38.92 | 291% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.03 | - |