Ad is loading...
FLCX
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
IH
Price
$1.64
Change
+$0.01 (+0.61%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
18 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLCX vs IH

Header iconFLCX vs IH Comparison
Open Charts FLCX vs IHBanner chart's image
flooidCX
Price$1.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
iHuman
Price$1.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.61%)
Volume$17.32K
CapitalizationN/A
FLCX vs IH Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLCX vs. IH commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCX is a Hold and IH is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FLCX: $1.00 vs. IH: $1.64)
Brand notoriety: FLCX and IH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLCX: 17% vs. IH: 64%
Market capitalization -- FLCX: $8.18M vs. IH: $93.88M
FLCX [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $8.18M. IH’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $93.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLCX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLCX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IH is a better buy in the long-term than FLCX.

Price Growth

FLCX (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IH (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -8.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

IH is expected to report earnings on Dec 05, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.43% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IH($93.9M) has a higher market cap than FLCX($8.19M). IH YTD gains are higher at: -43.559 vs. FLCX (-68.847). IH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 177M vs. FLCX (-755.97K). IH has higher revenues than FLCX: IH (1.03B) vs FLCX (49.8K).
FLCXIHFLCX / IH
Capitalization8.19M93.9M9%
EBITDA-755.97K177M-0%
Gain YTD-68.847-43.559158%
P/E RatioN/A3.76-
Revenue49.8K1.03B0%
Total Cash0N/A-
Total Debt3.96MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLCX: Fundamental Ratings
FLCX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APDWX10.75-0.02
-0.19%
Artisan Value Income Advisor
CBACX15.50-0.07
-0.45%
AB Global Risk Allocation C
NSBRX65.15-0.62
-0.94%
Nuveen Dividend Growth I
MCSDX40.58-0.41
-1.00%
NYLI WMC Enduring Capital Class R6
NRAAX50.20-0.70
-1.38%
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity A

FLCX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLCX and SGRP have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLCX and SGRP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLCX
1D Price
Change %
FLCX100%
N/A
SGRP - FLCX
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.81%
IH - FLCX
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
FA - FLCX
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
EEIQ - FLCX
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%
BLPG - FLCX
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.15%
More

IH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IH and UNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IH and UNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IH
1D Price
Change %
IH100%
+0.43%
UNF - IH
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
FEDU - IH
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
GHC - IH
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
VRME - IH
17%
Poorly correlated
+2.03%
RGP - IH
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
More