FLCX
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
74.49M
PCOFF
Price
$0.39
Change
+$0.29 (+290.00%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
426.68M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLCX vs PCOFF

Header iconFLCX vs PCOFF Comparison
Open Charts FLCX vs PCOFFBanner chart's image
flooidCX
Price$1.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization74.49M
Pico Far East Holdings
Price$0.39
Change+$0.29 (+290.00%)
Volume$12K
Capitalization426.68M
FLCX vs PCOFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLCX vs. PCOFF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCX is a Hold and PCOFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FLCX: $1.00 vs. PCOFF: $0.39)
Brand notoriety: FLCX and PCOFF are both not notable
FLCX represents the Data Processing Services, while PCOFF is part of the Advertising/Marketing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLCX: 100% vs. PCOFF: 21%
Market capitalization -- FLCX: $74.49M vs. PCOFF: $426.68M
FLCX [@Data Processing Services] is valued at $74.49M. PCOFF’s [@Advertising/Marketing Services] market capitalization is $426.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Data Processing Services] industry ranges from $46.09B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Advertising/Marketing Services] industry ranges from $216.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Data Processing Services] industry is $5.92B. The average market capitalization across the [@Advertising/Marketing Services] industry is $4.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLCX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePCOFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FLCX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PCOFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PCOFF is a better buy in the long-term than FLCX.

Price Growth

FLCX (@Data Processing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PCOFF (@Advertising/Marketing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.06%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +35.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +148.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Data Processing Services (-0.52% weekly)

The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.

@Advertising/Marketing Services (-0.33% weekly)

Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCOFF($427M) has a higher market cap than FLCX($74.5M). PCOFF has higher P/E ratio than FLCX: PCOFF (9.97) vs FLCX (3.13). PCOFF YTD gains are higher at: 68.957 vs. FLCX (-20.000). PCOFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 530M vs. FLCX (-755.97K). PCOFF has more cash in the bank: 2.17B vs. FLCX (0). FLCX has less debt than PCOFF: FLCX (3.69M) vs PCOFF (642M). PCOFF has higher revenues than FLCX: PCOFF (6.85B) vs FLCX (49.8K).
FLCXPCOFFFLCX / PCOFF
Capitalization74.5M427M17%
EBITDA-755.97K530M-0%
Gain YTD-20.00068.957-29%
P/E Ratio3.139.9731%
Revenue49.8K6.85B0%
Total Cash02.17B-
Total Debt3.69M642M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLCX vs PCOFF: Fundamental Ratings
FLCX
PCOFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3943
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10077
SMR RATING
1..100
10053
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5834
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9916
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2130

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PCOFF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLCX (57). This means that PCOFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLCX’s over the last 12 months.

PCOFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as FLCX (100). This means that PCOFF’s stock grew similarly to FLCX’s over the last 12 months.

PCOFF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLCX (100). This means that PCOFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLCX’s over the last 12 months.

PCOFF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as FLCX (58). This means that PCOFF’s stock grew similarly to FLCX’s over the last 12 months.

PCOFF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLCX (99). This means that PCOFF’s stock grew significantly faster than FLCX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLCXPCOFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTHCF0.790.08
+10.60%
CoTec Holdings Corp.
DELHF33.05N/A
N/A
De'Longhi S.p.A.
SHGKY2.44N/A
N/A
Sun Hung Kai & Co. Ltd.
EWSB8.75N/A
N/A
EWSB Bancorp, Inc.
SVNDY13.37-0.13
-0.96%
Seven & I Holdings Co., Ltd.

FLCX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLCX and SGRP have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLCX and SGRP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLCX
1D Price
Change %
FLCX100%
N/A
SGRP - FLCX
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
IH - FLCX
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
FA - FLCX
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
EEIQ - FLCX
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.76%
BLPG - FLCX
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
More

PCOFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PCOFF has been loosely correlated with PRSU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PCOFF jumps, then PRSU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCOFF
1D Price
Change %
PCOFF100%
N/A
PRSU - PCOFF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
RBA - PCOFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
YUMM - PCOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EUBG - PCOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
-3.03%
FLCX - PCOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More