FLCX
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
8.18M
PCOFF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.06 (-37.50%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
224.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLCX vs PCOFF

Header iconFLCX vs PCOFF Comparison
Open Charts FLCX vs PCOFFBanner chart's image
flooidCX
Price$1.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization8.18M
Pico Far East Holdings
Price$0.10
Change-$0.06 (-37.50%)
Volume$72K
Capitalization224.08M
FLCX vs PCOFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PCOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLCX vs. PCOFF commentary
Jul 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCX is a Hold and PCOFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2025
Stock price -- (FLCX: $1.00 vs. PCOFF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: FLCX and PCOFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLCX: 46% vs. PCOFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FLCX: $8.18M vs. PCOFF: $224.08M
FLCX [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $8.18M. PCOFF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $224.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLCX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePCOFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLCX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PCOFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PCOFF is a better buy in the long-term than FLCX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLCX’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PCOFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLCX’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PCOFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PCOFF is a better buy in the short-term than FLCX.

Price Growth

FLCX (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PCOFF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.96% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCOFF($224M) has a higher market cap than FLCX($8.19M). FLCX YTD gains are higher at: -20.000 vs. PCOFF (-56.522). PCOFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 308M vs. FLCX (-755.97K). PCOFF has more cash in the bank: 1.49B vs. FLCX (0). FLCX has less debt than PCOFF: FLCX (3.96M) vs PCOFF (829M). PCOFF has higher revenues than FLCX: PCOFF (4.69B) vs FLCX (49.8K).
FLCXPCOFFFLCX / PCOFF
Capitalization8.19M224M4%
EBITDA-755.97K308M-0%
Gain YTD-20.000-56.52235%
P/E RatioN/A8.47-
Revenue49.8K4.69B0%
Total Cash01.49B-
Total Debt3.96M829M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLCX vs PCOFF: Fundamental Ratings
FLCX
PCOFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10054
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7785
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7497
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PCOFF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLCX (58). This means that PCOFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLCX’s over the last 12 months.

PCOFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FLCX (100). This means that PCOFF’s stock grew similarly to FLCX’s over the last 12 months.

PCOFF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLCX (100). This means that PCOFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLCX’s over the last 12 months.

FLCX's Price Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as PCOFF (85). This means that FLCX’s stock grew similarly to PCOFF’s over the last 12 months.

FLCX's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as PCOFF (97). This means that FLCX’s stock grew similarly to PCOFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLCXPCOFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
3%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLCX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PCOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAFRX9.450.17
+1.83%
Commonwealth Africa
FRIFX12.150.02
+0.16%
Fidelity Real Estate Income
CCERX28.230.03
+0.11%
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core R
PGTYX81.700.07
+0.09%
Putnam Global Technology Y
CGEOX19.70-0.06
-0.30%
Calamos Global Equity R6

FLCX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLCX and SGRP have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLCX and SGRP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLCX
1D Price
Change %
FLCX100%
N/A
SGRP - FLCX
33%
Poorly correlated
+7.21%
IH - FLCX
8%
Poorly correlated
+4.28%
FA - FLCX
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
EEIQ - FLCX
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
BLPG - FLCX
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.30%
More

PCOFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PCOFF has been loosely correlated with PRSU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PCOFF jumps, then PRSU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCOFF
1D Price
Change %
PCOFF100%
N/A
PRSU - PCOFF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
RBA - PCOFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
YUMM - PCOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EUBG - PCOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
-5.93%
FLCX - PCOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More