FLD
Price
$3.91
Change
-$0.20 (-4.87%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
192.31M
54 days until earnings call
GS
Price
$790.05
Change
+$10.09 (+1.29%)
Updated
Oct 10, 11:37 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
235.07B
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLD vs GS

Header iconFLD vs GS Comparison
Open Charts FLD vs GSBanner chart's image
Fold Holdings
Price$3.91
Change-$0.20 (-4.87%)
Volume$341.14K
Capitalization192.31M
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$790.05
Change+$10.09 (+1.29%)
Volume$100
Capitalization235.07B
FLD vs GS Comparison Chart in %
FLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLD vs. GS commentary
Oct 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLD is a StrongBuy and GS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 10, 2025
Stock price -- (FLD: $3.91 vs. GS: $779.96)
Brand notoriety: FLD: Not notable vs. GS: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLD: 34% vs. GS: 94%
Market capitalization -- FLD: $192.31M vs. GS: $235.07B
FLD [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $192.31M. GS’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $235.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the long-term than FLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLD is a better buy in the short-term than GS.

Price Growth

FLD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.01% price change this week, while GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +96.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLD is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

GS is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.43% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($235B) has a higher market cap than FLD($192M). FLD has higher P/E ratio than GS: FLD (218.80) vs GS (17.18). GS YTD gains are higher at: 38.303 vs. FLD (-64.775). FLD has less debt than GS: FLD (79.9M) vs GS (373B). GS has higher revenues than FLD: GS (56.2B) vs FLD (5.19M).
FLDGSFLD / GS
Capitalization192M235B0%
EBITDA-29.75MN/A-
Gain YTD-64.77538.303-169%
P/E Ratio218.8017.181,274%
Revenue5.19M56.2B0%
Total Cash6.61MN/A-
Total Debt79.9M373B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GS: Fundamental Ratings
GS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
82
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10
SMR RATING
1..100
5
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLDGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
7%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
8%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JQC5.27N/A
N/A
Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund
TDEC23.37N/A
N/A
FT Vest Emerging Mkts Buffr ETF - Dec
QQQY25.63-0.01
-0.05%
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Target 30 Income ETF
SMH345.21-0.86
-0.25%
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
ENOR28.35-0.32
-1.11%
iShares MSCI Norway ETF

FLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLD and PWP have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLD and PWP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLD
1D Price
Change %
FLD100%
-4.87%
PWP - FLD
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
LAZ - FLD
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
MC - FLD
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
JEF - FLD
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
GS - FLD
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
More