FLD
Price
$3.27
Change
-$0.32 (-8.91%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
167.98M
89 days until earnings call
MC
Price
$70.66
Change
-$1.08 (-1.51%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.32B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLD vs MC

Header iconFLD vs MC Comparison
Open Charts FLD vs MCBanner chart's image
Fold Holdings
Price$3.27
Change-$0.32 (-8.91%)
Volume$3.13K
Capitalization167.98M
Moelis & Company
Price$70.66
Change-$1.08 (-1.51%)
Volume$6.04K
Capitalization5.32B
FLD vs MC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLD vs. MC commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLD is a Hold and MC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FLD: $3.59 vs. MC: $71.73)
Brand notoriety: FLD and MC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLD: 139% vs. MC: 68%
Market capitalization -- FLD: $167.98M vs. MC: $5.32B
FLD [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $167.98M. MC’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $5.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MC is a better buy in the long-term than FLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MC is a better buy in the short-term than FLD.

Price Growth

FLD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.37% price change this week, while MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLD is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

MC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.76% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MC($5.32B) has a higher market cap than FLD($168M). FLD has higher P/E ratio than MC: FLD (218.80) vs MC (28.02). MC YTD gains are higher at: 0.052 vs. FLD (-67.658). MC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 256M vs. FLD (-29.75M). MC has more cash in the bank: 222M vs. FLD (6.61M). FLD has less debt than MC: FLD (79.9M) vs MC (219M). MC has higher revenues than FLD: MC (1.38B) vs FLD (5.19M).
FLDMCFLD / MC
Capitalization168M5.32B3%
EBITDA-29.75M256M-12%
Gain YTD-67.6580.052-131,359%
P/E Ratio218.8028.02781%
Revenue5.19M1.38B0%
Total Cash6.61M222M3%
Total Debt79.9M219M36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MC: Fundamental Ratings
MC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLDMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VMXXF0.100.03
+38.44%
VALHALLA METALS INC.
CGEMY28.480.03
+0.11%
Capgemini SE
DCHIF0.41N/A
N/A
Digital China Holdings Ltd.
MSUXF13.07N/A
N/A
Misumi Group, Inc.
RDBBF0.21-0.02
-10.10%
ARTICORE GROUP LTD.

FLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLD and PWP have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLD and PWP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLD
1D Price
Change %
FLD100%
+5.28%
PWP - FLD
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.21%
LAZ - FLD
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.33%
EVR - FLD
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
MC - FLD
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
JEF - FLD
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
More