FLD
Price
$4.12
Change
-$0.16 (-3.74%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
192.77M
110 days until earnings call
PWP
Price
$22.35
Change
-$0.48 (-2.10%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.4B
77 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLD vs PWP

Header iconFLD vs PWP Comparison
Open Charts FLD vs PWPBanner chart's image
Fold Holdings
Price$4.12
Change-$0.16 (-3.74%)
Volume$74.91K
Capitalization192.77M
Perella Weinberg Partners
Price$22.35
Change-$0.48 (-2.10%)
Volume$21.58K
Capitalization1.4B
FLD vs PWP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLD vs. PWP commentary
Aug 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLD is a Hold and PWP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2025
Stock price -- (FLD: $4.12 vs. PWP: $22.35)
Brand notoriety: FLD and PWP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLD: 28% vs. PWP: 82%
Market capitalization -- FLD: $192.77M vs. PWP: $1.4B
FLD [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $192.77M. PWP’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePWP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PWP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PWP is a better buy in the long-term than FLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PWP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLD is a better buy in the short-term than PWP.

Price Growth

FLD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.49% price change this week, while PWP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLD is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

PWP is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.62% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWP($1.4B) has a higher market cap than FLD($193M). FLD has higher P/E ratio than PWP: FLD (218.80) vs PWP (21.70). PWP YTD gains are higher at: -3.607 vs. FLD (-62.883). PWP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 98.1M vs. FLD (-47.47M). PWP has more cash in the bank: 145M vs. FLD (11.7M). FLD has less debt than PWP: FLD (65.1M) vs PWP (185M). PWP has higher revenues than FLD: PWP (871M) vs FLD (2.16M).
FLDPWPFLD / PWP
Capitalization193M1.4B14%
EBITDA-47.47M98.1M-48%
Gain YTD-62.883-3.6071,743%
P/E Ratio218.8021.701,008%
Revenue2.16M871M0%
Total Cash11.7M145M8%
Total Debt65.1M185M35%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLDPWP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FBKFX17.18N/A
N/A
Fidelity Balanced K6
FCAJX13.17N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Climate Action A
VGLSX10.98N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I Global Strategy
PLGAX16.32N/A
N/A
Principal LargeCap Growth I A
MIPTX20.65N/A
N/A
Matthews Pacific Tiger Instl

FLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLD and LAZ have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLD and LAZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLD
1D Price
Change %
FLD100%
-3.74%
LAZ - FLD
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
PWP - FLD
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
EVR - FLD
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
MC - FLD
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
MRX - FLD
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
More

PWP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWP has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWP jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWP
1D Price
Change %
PWP100%
+1.20%
EVR - PWP
84%
Closely correlated
+2.27%
MC - PWP
83%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
PIPR - PWP
83%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
SF - PWP
78%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
LAZ - PWP
78%
Closely correlated
+2.65%
More