Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLDGX vs RBGEX
FLDGX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts FLDGX vs RBGEX
Meeder Dynamic Allocation Retail
Price$14.26
Change+$0.13 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets402.54M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$26.95
Change+$0.27 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.34B
FLDGX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLDGX vs. RBGEX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLDGX is a Buy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 22.3B vs. FLDGX (403M). FLDGX pays higher dividends than RBGEX: FLDGX (1.08) vs RBGEX (0.00). FLDGX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: FLDGX (25 years) vs RBGEX (11 years). FLDGX (1.42) is less costly to investors than RBGEX (1.17). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLDGX: RBGEX (250) vs FLDGX (2500). RBGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.69 vs. FLDGX (-5.00). RBGEX return over 5 years is better than : 47.41 vs. FLDGX (32.68).
| FLDGX | RBGEX | FLDGX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.17 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.17 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.136 | 8.669 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 403M | 22.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.00 | 9.69 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.66 | 40.16 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.68 | 47.41 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.97 | 71.75 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers