Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLDZ vs SCHM
FLDZ vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts FLDZ vs SCHM
RiverNorth Patriot ETF
Price$29.10
Change+$1.11 (+3.97%)
Volume$408
Net Assets4.37M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$28.70
Change+$0.15 (+0.53%)
Volume$1.3K
Net Assets11.67B
FLDZ vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLDZ vs. SCHM commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLDZ is a Buy and SCHM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 11.7B vs. FLDZ (4.37M). FLDZ has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: FLDZ (3.992) vs SCHM (3.703). FLDZ was incepted earlier than SCHM: FLDZ (3 years) vs SCHM (14 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FLDZ (0.70). FLDZ has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| FLDZ | SCHM | FLDZ / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 3.992 | 3.703 | 108% |
| Net Assets | 4.37M | 11.7B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.04 | 1,750% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 13.00 | 254% |
| Yield | 1.11 | 1.44 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLDZ | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 29 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLDZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLDZ has been closely correlated with SBNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLDZ jumps, then SBNY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLDZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLDZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| SBNY - FLDZ | 75% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CFG - FLDZ | 71% Closely correlated | +2.02% | ||
| ARE - FLDZ | 71% Closely correlated | +2.39% | ||
| CZR - FLDZ | 71% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| OZK - FLDZ | 70% Closely correlated | +4.06% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.92% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.00% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +3.04% | ||
More | ||||