Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLFGX vs RIRBX
FLFGX vs RIRBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLFGX vs. RIRBX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLFGX is a Buy and RIRBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FLFGX (37.8M). RIRBX pays higher dividends than FLFGX: RIRBX (2.40) vs FLFGX (1.57). FLFGX was incepted earlier than RIRBX: FLFGX (19 years) vs RIRBX (23 years). FLFGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than RIRBX (1.36). FLFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 214.00 vs. RIRBX (56.00). RIRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLFGX: RIRBX (250) vs FLFGX (2500). RIRBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.16 vs. FLFGX (-3.92). RIRBX return over 5 years is better than : 46.53 vs. FLFGX (24.65).
| FLFGX | RIRBX | FLFGX / RIRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.36 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.36 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.819 | 7.578 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.8M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 2.40 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.92 | 11.16 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.22 | 19.43 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.65 | 46.53 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.37 | 36.04 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement