FLG
Price
$11.76
Change
+$0.12 (+1.03%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
2.56B
46 days until earnings call
GLBZ
Price
$4.99
Change
+$0.04 (+0.81%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
15.82M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLG vs GLBZ

Header iconFLG vs GLBZ Comparison
Open Charts FLG vs GLBZBanner chart's image
Flagstar Financial
Price$11.76
Change+$0.12 (+1.03%)
Volume$5.56M
Capitalization2.56B
Glen Burnie Ban
Price$4.99
Change+$0.04 (+0.81%)
Volume$3.04K
Capitalization15.82M
FLG vs GLBZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLG vs. GLBZ commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLG is a StrongBuy and GLBZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FLG: $11.76 vs. GLBZ: $4.99)
Brand notoriety: FLG and GLBZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLG: 88% vs. GLBZ: 61%
Market capitalization -- FLG: $2.56B vs. GLBZ: $15.82M
FLG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.56B. GLBZ’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $15.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGLBZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GLBZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLG is a better buy in the long-term than GLBZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FLG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FLG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.17% price change this week, while GLBZ (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

GLBZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.57% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLG($2.56B) has a higher market cap than GLBZ($15.8M). GLBZ has higher P/E ratio than FLG: GLBZ (10.70) vs FLG (1.16). FLG YTD gains are higher at: 26.263 vs. GLBZ (-14.335). GLBZ has less debt than FLG: GLBZ (30M) vs FLG (21.3B). FLG has higher revenues than GLBZ: FLG (3.63B) vs GLBZ (12.9M).
FLGGLBZFLG / GLBZ
Capitalization2.56B15.8M16,209%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.263-14.335-183%
P/E Ratio1.1610.7011%
Revenue3.63B12.9M28,163%
Total CashN/A1.97M-
Total Debt21.3B30M71,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLG vs GLBZ: Fundamental Ratings
FLG
GLBZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1911
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
79100
SMR RATING
1..100
864
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3760
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
991
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
21n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLG's Valuation (14) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLBZ (93) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew significantly faster than GLBZ’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as GLBZ (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew similarly to GLBZ’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's SMR Rating (8) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLBZ (64) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLBZ’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as GLBZ (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew similarly to GLBZ’s over the last 12 months.

GLBZ's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLG (99) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that GLBZ’s stock grew significantly faster than FLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NMIAX27.48N/A
N/A
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
TASCX18.32N/A
N/A
Third Avenue Small Cap Value Instl
VSOIX43.18N/A
N/A
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp I
FGRSX42.41N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Intl Leaders R6
TSGDX15.75N/A
N/A
Transamerica Sustainable Growth Eq A

FLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLG has been loosely correlated with SBNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLG jumps, then SBNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLG
1D Price
Change %
FLG100%
+1.12%
SBNY - FLG
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TECTP - FLG
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OZKAP - FLG
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
VLYPP - FLG
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
WAFDP - FLG
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
More

GLBZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLBZ and PBBK have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLBZ and PBBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLBZ
1D Price
Change %
GLBZ100%
+0.79%
PBBK - GLBZ
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.92%
KFFB - GLBZ
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
FSEA - GLBZ
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
JMSB - GLBZ
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
FLG - GLBZ
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
More