FLG vs GLBZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLG is a Hold and GLBZ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGLBZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FLG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- GLBZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FLG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FLG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.41% price change this week, while GLBZ (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
GLBZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.64% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| FLG | GLBZ | FLG / GLBZ | |
| Capitalization | 2.56B | 15.8M | 16,209% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.729 | -10.266 | -280% |
| P/E Ratio | 1.16 | 10.70 | 11% |
| Revenue | 3.63B | 12.9M | 28,163% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.97M | - |
| Total Debt | 21.3B | 30M | 71,000% |
FLG | GLBZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 8 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLG's Valuation (15) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLBZ (97) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew significantly faster than GLBZ’s over the last 12 months.
FLG's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as GLBZ (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew similarly to GLBZ’s over the last 12 months.
FLG's SMR Rating (8) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLBZ (64) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLBZ’s over the last 12 months.
FLG's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as GLBZ (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew similarly to GLBZ’s over the last 12 months.
GLBZ's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLG (99) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that GLBZ’s stock grew significantly faster than FLG’s over the last 12 months.
| FLG | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% |
FLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLG has been loosely correlated with SBNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLG jumps, then SBNY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLG | 100% | -1.07% | ||
| SBNY - FLG | 63% Loosely correlated | -4.41% | ||
| TECTP - FLG | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| OZKAP - FLG | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| VLYPP - FLG | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| WAFDP - FLG | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
More | ||||
GLBZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GLBZ and PBBK have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLBZ and PBBK's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLBZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLBZ | 100% | +7.55% | ||
| PBBK - GLBZ | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.45% | ||
| FSEA - GLBZ | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| JMSB - GLBZ | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.23% | ||
| FLG - GLBZ | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.07% | ||
| FNWD - GLBZ | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
More | ||||