FLG
Price
$11.96
Change
-$0.11 (-0.91%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
4.97B
15 days until earnings call
MBWM
Price
$45.14
Change
-$0.20 (-0.44%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
733.46M
12 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLG vs MBWM

Header iconFLG vs MBWM Comparison
Open Charts FLG vs MBWMBanner chart's image
Flagstar Financial
Price$11.96
Change-$0.11 (-0.91%)
Volume$6.9M
Capitalization4.97B
Mercantile Bank
Price$45.14
Change-$0.20 (-0.44%)
Volume$42.11K
Capitalization733.46M
FLG vs MBWM Comparison Chart in %
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLG vs. MBWM commentary
Oct 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLG is a StrongBuy and MBWM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FLG: $11.96 vs. MBWM: $45.14)
Brand notoriety: FLG and MBWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLG: 130% vs. MBWM: 77%
Market capitalization -- FLG: $4.97B vs. MBWM: $733.46M
FLG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.97B. MBWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $733.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $169.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMBWM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FLG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MBWM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than FLG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBWM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MBWM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLG is a better buy in the short-term than MBWM.

Price Growth

FLG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.13% price change this week, while MBWM (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLG is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLG($4.97B) has a higher market cap than MBWM($733M). FLG YTD gains are higher at: 28.509 vs. MBWM (3.971). MBWM has less debt than FLG: MBWM (496M) vs FLG (13.2B). FLG has higher revenues than MBWM: FLG (2.15B) vs MBWM (235M).
FLGMBWMFLG / MBWM
Capitalization4.97B733M678%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.5093.971718%
P/E RatioN/A8.97-
Revenue2.15B235M913%
Total CashN/A98.9M-
Total Debt13.2B496M2,661%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLG vs MBWM: Fundamental Ratings
FLG
MBWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6857
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7718
SMR RATING
1..100
1126
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5358
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10045
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLG's Valuation (25) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (31) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLG (77) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLG’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's SMR Rating (11) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (26) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLG (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLGMBWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTEUX16.230.34
+2.17%
Baron Technology R6
VBINX52.64N/A
N/A
Vanguard Balanced Index Inv
LVOPX18.14N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities P
SGRHX53.52N/A
N/A
Allspring Growth R6
INAAX16.69N/A
N/A
Kotak India Equity Fund Class A

FLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLG has been closely correlated with VLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLG jumps, then VLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLG
1D Price
Change %
FLG100%
-0.91%
VLY - FLG
68%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
STBA - FLG
68%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
CNOB - FLG
67%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
MBWM - FLG
67%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
FRST - FLG
67%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
More

MBWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBWM
1D Price
Change %
MBWM100%
-0.44%
PEBO - MBWM
91%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
STBA - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
TCBK - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
SBSI - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
IBCP - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
More