FLG
Price
$11.81
Change
-$0.15 (-1.25%)
Updated
May 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.56B
61 days until earnings call
SBNY
Price
$0.51
Change
-$0.03 (-5.56%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.15M
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLG vs SBNY

Header iconFLG vs SBNY Comparison
Open Charts FLG vs SBNYBanner chart's image
Flagstar Financial
Price$11.81
Change-$0.15 (-1.25%)
Volume$114.36K
Capitalization2.56B
Signature Bank (New York, NY)
Price$0.51
Change-$0.03 (-5.56%)
Volume$32.65K
Capitalization3.15M
FLG vs SBNY Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLG vs. SBNY commentary
May 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLG is a Hold and SBNY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 24, 2025
Stock price -- (FLG: $11.96 vs. SBNY: $0.51)
Brand notoriety: FLG and SBNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLG: 1% vs. SBNY: 73%
Market capitalization -- FLG: $2.56B vs. SBNY: $3.15M
FLG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.56B. SBNY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBNY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FLG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SBNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLG is a better buy in the long-term than SBNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBNY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SBNY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBNY is a better buy in the short-term than FLG.

Price Growth

FLG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.78% price change this week, while SBNY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

SBNY is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.94% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLG($2.56B) has a higher market cap than SBNY($3.15M). FLG has higher P/E ratio than SBNY: FLG (1.16) vs SBNY (0.00). FLG YTD gains are higher at: 28.300 vs. SBNY (-62.774). SBNY has less debt than FLG: SBNY (2.31B) vs FLG (21.3B). FLG has higher revenues than SBNY: FLG (3.63B) vs SBNY (2.7B).
FLGSBNYFLG / SBNY
Capitalization2.56B3.15M81,327%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.300-62.774-45%
P/E Ratio1.160.0060,063%
Revenue3.63B2.7B135%
Total CashN/A11.3B-
Total Debt21.3B2.31B921%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLG vs SBNY: Fundamental Ratings
FLG
SBNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1968
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84100
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3796
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9997
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a29

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBNY's Valuation (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FLG (14) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SBNY’s stock grew similarly to FLG’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SBNY (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew similarly to SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

SBNY's SMR Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FLG (8) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SBNY’s stock grew similarly to FLG’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBNY (96) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

SBNY's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FLG (99) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SBNY’s stock grew similarly to FLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLGSBNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRILX60.67N/A
N/A
Parnassus Core Equity Institutional
LSVAX17.98N/A
N/A
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Admin
IRGJX48.84N/A
N/A
Voya Russell Mid Cap Growth Idx Port I
MFAPX26.56N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Intl Advtg A
TRSLX4.57N/A
N/A
Transamerica Small Cap Value R

FLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLG has been loosely correlated with SBNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLG jumps, then SBNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLG
1D Price
Change %
FLG100%
N/A
SBNY - FLG
63%
Loosely correlated
-5.56%
TECTP - FLG
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OZKAP - FLG
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
VLYPP - FLG
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WAFDP - FLG
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
More

SBNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBNY has been closely correlated with WAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBNY jumps, then WAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBNY
1D Price
Change %
SBNY100%
-5.56%
WAL - SBNY
84%
Closely correlated
N/A
FITB - SBNY
74%
Closely correlated
N/A
SNV - SBNY
74%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
OZK - SBNY
73%
Closely correlated
N/A
BKU - SBNY
73%
Closely correlated
N/A
More