FLG
Price
$11.06
Change
+$1.46 (+15.21%)
Updated
Jan 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.56B
82 days until earnings call
UNIF
Price
$4.02
Change
+$0.02 (+0.50%)
Updated
Jan 29 closing price
Capitalization
60.94M
Ad is loading...

FLG vs UNIF

Header iconFLG vs UNIF Comparison
Open Charts FLG vs UNIFBanner chart's image
Flagstar Financial
Price$11.06
Change+$1.46 (+15.21%)
Volume$99.8K
Capitalization2.56B
U & I Financial
Price$4.02
Change+$0.02 (+0.50%)
Volume$8.51K
Capitalization60.94M
FLG vs UNIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLG vs. UNIF commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLG is a Buy and UNIF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (FLG: $11.06 vs. UNIF: $4.02)
Brand notoriety: FLG and UNIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLG: 291% vs. UNIF: 101%
Market capitalization -- FLG: $2.56B vs. UNIF: $60.94M
FLG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.56B. UNIF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $60.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUNIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UNIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLG is a better buy in the long-term than UNIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNIF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UNIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLG is a better buy in the short-term than UNIF.

Price Growth

FLG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +17.78% price change this week, while UNIF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLG is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLG($2.56B) has a higher market cap than UNIF($60.9M). UNIF has higher P/E ratio than FLG: UNIF (5.46) vs FLG (1.16). UNIF YTD gains are higher at: 21.450 vs. FLG (18.542). UNIF has less debt than FLG: UNIF (10M) vs FLG (21.3B). FLG has higher revenues than UNIF: FLG (3.63B) vs UNIF (28.7M).
FLGUNIFFLG / UNIF
Capitalization2.56B60.9M4,205%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.54221.45086%
P/E Ratio1.165.4621%
Revenue3.63B28.7M12,659%
Total CashN/A31.1M-
Total Debt21.3B10M213,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLG vs UNIF: Fundamental Ratings
FLG
UNIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2137
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5659
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9991
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a37

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNIF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as FLG (8) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UNIF’s stock grew similarly to FLG’s over the last 12 months.

UNIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FLG (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UNIF’s stock grew similarly to FLG’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's SMR Rating (9) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for UNIF (97) in the null industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew significantly faster than UNIF’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as UNIF (59) in the null industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew similarly to UNIF’s over the last 12 months.

UNIF's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as FLG (99) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UNIF’s stock grew similarly to FLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLGUNIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEMG53.630.83
+1.57%
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
RFEM64.260.92
+1.46%
First Trust RiverFront Dyn Em Mkts ETF
VIDI25.670.24
+0.94%
Vident International Equity Strategy ETF
FMCX32.450.29
+0.91%
FMC Excelsior Focus Equity ETF
TMFC61.380.10
+0.16%
Motley Fool 100 ETF

FLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLG has been loosely correlated with SBNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLG jumps, then SBNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLG
1D Price
Change %
FLG100%
+15.21%
SBNY - FLG
63%
Loosely correlated
-8.89%
VLY - FLG
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
TOWN - FLG
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
FBIZ - FLG
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
CMTDF - FLG
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

UNIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UNIF and FLG have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UNIF and FLG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNIF
1D Price
Change %
UNIF100%
N/A
FLG - UNIF
24%
Poorly correlated
+15.21%
PSBQ - UNIF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UOVEF - UNIF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNIB - UNIF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNCFF - UNIF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
More