Advertisement
FLGC vs SWGHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLGC is a StrongBuy and SWGHF is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLGC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FLGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
| FLGC | SWGHF | FLGC / SWGHF | |
| Capitalization | 10.9M | 1.55B | 1% |
| EBITDA | -14.64M | 36B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -56.634 | -14.030 | 404% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 15.64 | - |
| Revenue | 52.4M | 177B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 3.68M | 51.4B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 7.3M | 93.4B | 0% |
SWGHF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FLGC | SWGHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 7% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 8% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
Advertisement
FLGC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLGC has been loosely correlated with SNDL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLGC jumps, then SNDL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLGC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLGC | 100% | -9.22% | ||
| SNDL - FLGC | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| ACET - FLGC | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| CGC - FLGC | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SXTC - FLGC | 26% Poorly correlated | +5.33% | ||
| IMCC - FLGC | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.99% | ||
More | ||||
SWGHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SWGHF and GLASF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWGHF and GLASF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SWGHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWGHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GLASF - SWGHF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
| BFRI - SWGHF | 5% Poorly correlated | -6.86% | ||
| TKNO - SWGHF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
| FLGC - SWGHF | 4% Poorly correlated | -9.22% | ||
| AAWH - SWGHF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||