Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLLA vs ILF
FLLA vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLLA vs ILF
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$21.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
Volume$100
Net Assets34.02M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$26.20
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Volume$733
Net Assets1.64B
FLLA vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLLA vs. ILF commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLLA is a Hold and ILF is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.65B vs. FLLA (34M). FLLA has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: FLLA (31.651) vs ILF (28.299). FLLA was incepted earlier than ILF: FLLA (7 years) vs ILF (24 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than ILF (0.48). ILF has a higher turnover FLLA (14.31) vs FLLA (14.31).
| FLLA | ILF | FLLA / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 31.651 | 28.299 | 112% |
| Net Assets | 34M | 1.65B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.48 | 40% |
| Turnover | 14.31 | 18.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 5.67 | 6.16 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLLA | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 82% | 21 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 9 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | +1.73% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| ECL - FLLA | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
| AC - FLLA | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | -1% Poorly correlated | +1.37% |
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | +1.71% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 72% Closely correlated | +2.57% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 71% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| NU - ILF | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.55% | ||
More | ||||