Ad is loading...
FLLA vs ILF
FLLA vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLLA vs ILF
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$20.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.15K
CapitalizationN/A
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$25.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$311.49K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLLA vs ILF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
FLLA vs. ILF commentary
Oct 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLLA is a Sell and ILF is a StrongSell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.35B vs. FLLA (50.6M). ILF has a higher annual dividend yield than FLLA: ILF (-10.345) vs FLLA (-15.639). FLLA was incepted earlier than ILF: FLLA (6 years) vs ILF (23 years). ILF has a higher turnover FLLA (10.49) vs FLLA (10.49).
| FLLA | ILF | FLLA / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | -15.639 | -10.345 | 151% |
| Net Assets | 50.6M | 1.35B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 10.49 | 24.00 | 44% |
| Yield | 5.68 | 4.71 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLLA | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 81% | about 1 month ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 9 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| ECL - FLLA | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.58% | ||
| AC - FLLA | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.87% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | -1% Poorly correlated | +2.32% |
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 72% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SCCO - ILF | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 59% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||