Ad is loading...
FLLA vs ILF
FLLA vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLLA vs ILF
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$19.17
Change-$0.21 (-1.08%)
Volume$17.57K
Net Assets29.1M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$23.47
Change-$0.70 (-2.90%)
Volume$780.66K
Net Assets1.33B
FLLA vs ILF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLLA vs. ILF commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLLA is a Buy and ILF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.33B vs. FLLA (29.1M). FLLA has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: FLLA (13.449) vs ILF (12.243). FLLA was incepted earlier than ILF: FLLA (6 years) vs ILF (23 years). ILF has a higher turnover FLLA (10.49) vs FLLA (10.49).
| FLLA | ILF | FLLA / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 13.449 | 12.243 | 110% |
| Net Assets | 29.1M | 1.33B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 10.49 | 24.00 | 44% |
| Yield | 5.68 | 4.71 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLLA | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | -1.06% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 36% Loosely correlated | -3.94% | ||
| ECL - FLLA | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
| AC - FLLA | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.40% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | -1% Poorly correlated | -2.75% |
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | -2.90% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 72% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| SCCO - ILF | 61% Loosely correlated | -5.02% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
More | ||||