Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLLA vs ILF
FLLA vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLLA vs ILF
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$24.36
Change-$0.12 (-0.49%)
Volume$400
Net Assets44.15M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$30.13
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
Volume$8.22K
Net Assets2.26B
FLLA vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLLA vs. ILF commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLLA is a Hold and ILF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 2.26B vs. FLLA (44.2M). FLLA (48.442) and ILF (47.585) have matching annual dividend yield . FLLA was incepted earlier than ILF: FLLA (7 years) vs ILF (24 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than ILF (0.47). ILF has a higher turnover FLLA (14.31) vs FLLA (14.31).
| FLLA | ILF | FLLA / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 48.442 | 47.585 | 102% |
| Net Assets | 44.2M | 2.26B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.47 | 40% |
| Turnover | 14.31 | 18.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 4.88 | 5.07 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLLA | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | 50% Loosely correlated | +3.24% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| ECL - FLLA | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
| ACGP - FLLA | -5% Poorly correlated | N/A |
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 76% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 66% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||