Ad is loading...
FLLA vs ILF
FLLA vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLLA vs ILF
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$20.85
Change+$0.09 (+0.43%)
Volume$101
Net Assets30.99M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$24.98
Change+$0.08 (+0.32%)
Volume$135
Net Assets1.47B
FLLA vs ILF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLLA vs. ILF commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLLA is a Buy and ILF is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.47B vs. FLLA (31M). FLLA has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: FLLA (22.833) vs ILF (19.082). FLLA was incepted earlier than ILF: FLLA (7 years) vs ILF (24 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than ILF (0.48). FLLA has a higher turnover ILF (7.00) vs ILF (7.00).
| FLLA | ILF | FLLA / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 22.833 | 19.082 | 120% |
| Net Assets | 31M | 1.47B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.48 | 40% |
| Turnover | 8.97 | 7.00 | 128% |
| Yield | 6.14 | 6.61 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLLA | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 85% | 21 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| ECL - FLLA | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
| AC - FLLA | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.08% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | -1% Poorly correlated | +0.30% |
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | +0.65% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 72% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| GGB - ILF | 70% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | -2.56% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| NU - ILF | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
More | ||||