Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLLA vs ILF
FLLA vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLLA vs ILF
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
Price$23.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Volume$35.12K
Net Assets38.86M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$28.37
Change+$0.06 (+0.21%)
Volume$1.27M
Net Assets1.94B
FLLA vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLLA vs. ILF commentary
Oct 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLLA is a Hold and ILF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.94B vs. FLLA (38.9M). FLLA (39.466) and ILF (38.872) have matching annual dividend yield . FLLA was incepted earlier than ILF: FLLA (7 years) vs ILF (24 years). FLLA (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than ILF (0.47). ILF has a higher turnover FLLA (14.31) vs FLLA (14.31).
| FLLA | ILF | FLLA / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 39.466 | 38.872 | 102% |
| Net Assets | 38.9M | 1.94B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.47 | 40% |
| Turnover | 14.31 | 18.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 4.90 | 5.16 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLLA | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| ECL - FLLA | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
| ACGP - FLLA | -5% Poorly correlated | +4.95% |
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 76% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 66% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 66% Closely correlated | +2.19% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
More | ||||