FLMCF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
4.5M
GIGGF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
6.39M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLMCF vs GIGGF

Header iconFLMCF vs GIGGF Comparison
Open Charts FLMCF vs GIGGFBanner chart's image
First Lithium Minerals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization4.5M
Giga Metals
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$90.96K
Capitalization6.39M
FLMCF vs GIGGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GIGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLMCF vs. GIGGF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMCF is a Hold and GIGGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FLMCF: $0.03 vs. GIGGF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: FLMCF and GIGGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLMCF: 67% vs. GIGGF: 104%
Market capitalization -- FLMCF: $4.5M vs. GIGGF: $6.39M
FLMCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $4.5M. GIGGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $6.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLMCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGIGGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GIGGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GIGGF is a better buy in the long-term than FLMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLMCF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GIGGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLMCF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • GIGGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FLMCF and GIGGF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FLMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GIGGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GIGGF($6.39M) has a higher market cap than FLMCF($4.5M). GIGGF YTD gains are higher at: -31.765 vs. FLMCF (-43.973). FLMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.13M vs. GIGGF (-1.51M). FLMCF has more cash in the bank: 1.73M vs. GIGGF (101K). FLMCF (0) and GIGGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FLMCFGIGGFFLMCF / GIGGF
Capitalization4.5M6.39M70%
EBITDA-1.13M-1.51M75%
Gain YTD-43.973-31.765138%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.73M101K1,715%
Total DebtN/A206K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GIGGF: Fundamental Ratings
GIGGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLMCFGIGGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GIGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INDV24.980.25
+1.01%
Indivior PLC
HTLD8.610.03
+0.35%
Heartland Express
CFG51.71-0.80
-1.52%
Citizens Financial Group
ANIK8.94-0.15
-1.65%
Anika Therapeutics
MBIO1.43-0.04
-2.72%
Mustang Bio Inc

GIGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GIGGF and TLOFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GIGGF and TLOFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GIGGF
1D Price
Change %
GIGGF100%
+1.61%
TLOFF - GIGGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
FLMCF - GIGGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NLIBF - GIGGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTWOF - GIGGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BATXF - GIGGF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More