FLMCF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
3.42M
GMBXF
Price
$8.51
Change
+$0.46 (+5.71%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
62.32B
28 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLMCF vs GMBXF

Header iconFLMCF vs GMBXF Comparison
Open Charts FLMCF vs GMBXFBanner chart's image
First Lithium Minerals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization3.42M
Grupo Mexico S.A.B. de C.V
Price$8.51
Change+$0.46 (+5.71%)
Volume$28.1K
Capitalization62.32B
FLMCF vs GMBXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLMCF vs. GMBXF commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMCF is a Hold and GMBXF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FLMCF: $0.03 vs. GMBXF: $8.51)
Brand notoriety: FLMCF and GMBXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLMCF: 100% vs. GMBXF: 193%
Market capitalization -- FLMCF: $3.42M vs. GMBXF: $62.32B
FLMCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $3.42M. GMBXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $62.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLMCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGMBXF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FLMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GMBXF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMBXF is a better buy in the long-term than FLMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLMCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMBXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLMCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • GMBXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLMCF is a better buy in the short-term than GMBXF.

Price Growth

FLMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GMBXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +16.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +54.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +291.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

GMBXF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.30% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMBXF($62.3B) has a higher market cap than FLMCF($3.42M). GMBXF YTD gains are higher at: 81.450 vs. FLMCF (-43.973). GMBXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9B vs. FLMCF (-1.13M). GMBXF has more cash in the bank: 9.02B vs. FLMCF (1.73M). GMBXF has higher revenues than FLMCF: GMBXF (16.4B) vs FLMCF (0).
FLMCFGMBXFFLMCF / GMBXF
Capitalization3.42M62.3B0%
EBITDA-1.13M9B-0%
Gain YTD-43.97381.450-54%
P/E RatioN/A17.02-
Revenue016.4B-
Total Cash1.73M9.02B0%
Total DebtN/A10.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GMBXF: Fundamental Ratings
GMBXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21
SMR RATING
1..100
48
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
19
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLMCFGMBXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RDHL2.340.50
+27.17%
Redhill Biopharma Ltd
MEDP500.763.97
+0.80%
Medpace Holdings
LIDR2.35-0.01
-0.42%
AEye
BWLP14.57-0.58
-3.83%
BW LPG Ltd.
ARCT18.78-3.39
-15.29%
Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings

FLMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLMCF and EUEMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLMCF and EUEMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLMCF
1D Price
Change %
FLMCF100%
N/A
EUEMF - FLMCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PXCLF - FLMCF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JUBPF - FLMCF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMGDF - FLMCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+8.26%
GMBXF - FLMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.71%
More

GMBXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMBXF has been loosely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMBXF jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMBXF
1D Price
Change %
GMBXF100%
+5.71%
TECK - GMBXF
54%
Loosely correlated
+6.42%
IVPAF - GMBXF
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.85%
GLNCY - GMBXF
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
RIO - GMBXF
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
BHP - GMBXF
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.70%
More