FLMCF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
3.45M
PXCLF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.02 (+100.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
9.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLMCF vs PXCLF

Header iconFLMCF vs PXCLF Comparison
Open Charts FLMCF vs PXCLFBanner chart's image
First Lithium Minerals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization3.45M
Phoenix Copper
Price$0.04
Change+$0.02 (+100.00%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization9.31M
FLMCF vs PXCLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PXCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLMCF vs. PXCLF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMCF is a Hold and PXCLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FLMCF: $0.03 vs. PXCLF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: FLMCF and PXCLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLMCF: 100% vs. PXCLF: 419%
Market capitalization -- FLMCF: $3.45M vs. PXCLF: $9.31M
FLMCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $3.45M. PXCLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $9.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLMCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePXCLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PXCLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PXCLF is a better buy in the long-term than FLMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLMCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PXCLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLMCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • PXCLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLMCF is a better buy in the short-term than PXCLF.

Price Growth

FLMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PXCLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -30.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +271.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.08% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PXCLF($9.31M) has a higher market cap than FLMCF($3.45M). FLMCF YTD gains are higher at: -43.973 vs. PXCLF (-51.515).
FLMCFPXCLFFLMCF / PXCLF
Capitalization3.45M9.31M37%
EBITDA-1.13MN/A-
Gain YTD-43.973-51.51585%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash1.73MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PXCLF: Fundamental Ratings
PXCLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
94
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLMCFPXCLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PXCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMX20.50-0.03
-0.15%
America Movil SAB de CV
GVA108.63-0.36
-0.33%
Granite Construction
ECVT8.74-0.07
-0.79%
Ecovyst
SGRP1.09-0.02
-1.80%
SPAR Group
SLND4.22-0.31
-6.84%
Southland Holdings

FLMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLMCF and EUEMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLMCF and EUEMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLMCF
1D Price
Change %
FLMCF100%
N/A
EUEMF - FLMCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PXCLF - FLMCF
26%
Poorly correlated
+99.00%
JUBPF - FLMCF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMGDF - FLMCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.67%
GMBXF - FLMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
More

PXCLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PXCLF and JUBPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PXCLF and JUBPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PXCLF
1D Price
Change %
PXCLF100%
+99.00%
JUBPF - PXCLF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLMCF - PXCLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMGDF - PXCLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.67%
BMTLF - PXCLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NMG - PXCLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%
More