FLMCF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
4.5M
PXCLF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
9.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLMCF vs PXCLF

Header iconFLMCF vs PXCLF Comparison
Open Charts FLMCF vs PXCLFBanner chart's image
First Lithium Minerals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization4.5M
Phoenix Copper
Price$0.06
Change-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Volume$3.55K
Capitalization9.41M
FLMCF vs PXCLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PXCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLMCF vs. PXCLF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMCF is a Hold and PXCLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FLMCF: $0.03 vs. PXCLF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: FLMCF and PXCLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLMCF: 67% vs. PXCLF: 93%
Market capitalization -- FLMCF: $4.5M vs. PXCLF: $9.41M
FLMCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $4.5M. PXCLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $9.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLMCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePXCLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PXCLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PXCLF is a better buy in the long-term than FLMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLMCF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PXCLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLMCF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PXCLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PXCLF is a better buy in the short-term than FLMCF.

Price Growth

FLMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PXCLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +313.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PXCLF($9.41M) has a higher market cap than FLMCF($4.5M). PXCLF YTD gains are higher at: -29.794 vs. FLMCF (-43.973).
FLMCFPXCLFFLMCF / PXCLF
Capitalization4.5M9.41M48%
EBITDA-1.13MN/A-
Gain YTD-43.973-29.794148%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash1.73MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PXCLF: Fundamental Ratings
PXCLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
90
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLMCFPXCLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PXCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACIU2.280.13
+6.05%
AC Immune SA
CCM5.500.26
+5.06%
Concord Medical Services Holding Limited
RERE4.360.11
+2.59%
ATRenew
FMC37.780.49
+1.31%
FMC Corp
NXPI226.741.35
+0.60%
NXP Semiconductors NV